Thursday, September 03, 2009

Feds didn't clear brush in wildfire area

Federal authorities failed to follow through on plans earlier this year to burn away highly flammable brush in a forest on the edge of Los Angeles to avoid the very kind of wildfire now raging there, The Associated Press has learned. Months before the huge blaze erupted, the U.S. Forest Service obtained permits to burn away the undergrowth and brush on more than 1,700 acres of the Angeles National Forest. But just 193 acres had been cleared by the time the fire broke out, Forest Service resource officer Steve Bear said. Could more have been done to clear tinder-dry hillsides and canyons? "We don't necessarily disagree with that," Bear said. "We weren't able to complete what we wanted to do." Some critics suggested that protests from environmentalists over prescribed burns contributed to the disaster, which came after the brush was allowed to build up for as much as 40 years. "This brush was ready to explode," said Los Angeles County Supervisor Mike Antonovich, whose district overlaps the forest. "The environmentalists have gone to the extreme to prevent controlled burns, and as a result we have this catastrophe today."...AP

2 comments:

Unknown said...

The failure to clear brush in wildfire areas is a debatable method for reducing risks of wildfires, but it is not a stand alone strategy. It would be better to develop a multi-faceted wildland fire management system that included developing fire barriers between wild areas and developed areas, as well as brush clearing and building restrictions in high risk areas. These are the ideas that my class of students working on science fair projects came up with. What does California have as its main ways for mitigating for wildfires, does anyone know?

al bruno said...

Oh good, that’s always progress, poor people that have to endure such a tragedy; our prayers to the Lord are with you. Keep strong…