Issues of concern to people who live in the west: property rights, water rights, endangered species, livestock grazing, energy production, wilderness and western agriculture. Plus a few items on western history, western literature and the sport of rodeo... Frank DuBois served as the NM Secretary of Agriculture from 1988 to 2003. DuBois is a former legislative assistant to a U.S. Senator, a Deputy Assistant Secretary of Interior, and is the founder of the DuBois Rodeo Scholarship.
Tuesday, June 04, 2013
Federal Judge Rules for Property Rights, Smacks Down Abusive Feds
In an historic 104-page ruling, Chief Judge Robert C. Jones of the
Federal District Court of Nevada has struck a major blow for property
rights and, at the same time, has smacked down federal agencies that
have been riding roughshod over Western ranchers and property owners. Judge Jones said he found that “the government and the agents of the
government in that locale, sometime in the ’70s and ’80s, entered into a
conspiracy, a literal, intentional conspiracy, to deprive the Hages of
not only their permit grazing rights, for whatever reason, but also to
deprive them of their vested property rights under the takings clause,
and I find that that’s a sufficient basis to hold that there is
irreparable harm if I don’t … restrain the government from continuing in
that conduct.” In fact, Judge Jones accused the federal
bureaucrats of racketeering under the federal RICO (Racketeer Influenced
and Corruption Organizations) statute, and accused them as well of
extortion, mail fraud, and fraud, in an effort “to kill the business of
Mr. Hage.” Notably, the court said, "The Government may not abuse its discretion in
refusing to renew, or in revoking, a [grazing] privilege."
Significantly, the family will be under permanent injunctive relief
and the government shall not reduce the Hage's permits by more than 25
percent for any period of time without the courts' consent, and never
permanently. Specifically, the court found, "The Government has
abused its discretion in the present case through a series of actions
designed to strip the [Hage] Estate of its grazing permits, and
ultimately to strip Defendants of their ability to use their water
rights." He explained, "Substantive due process protects individuals
from arbitrary deprivation of their liberty by government." The
court further explained, "The Government cannot withdraw them (grazing
permits) or refuse to renew them vindictively or for reasons totally
unrelated to the merits of the application as governed by published laws
and regulations, lest the Government abuse its executive power in a way
that shocks the conscience." Because of the government's
refusal to consider any grazing applications from the Hages, the court
found the subsequent "chain of events is the result of the Government's
arbitrary denial of E. Wayne Hage's renewal permit for 1993-2003, and
the effects of this due process violation is continuing."...more
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment