By Mike Maharrey
An Illinois bill restricting drone spying to the point of near extinction now heads to the governor’s desk for his signature.
If signed into law, SB1587 would
prohibit law enforcement angencies from using unmanned drones to gather
evidence or other information without a warrant in most cases.
The House overwhelmingly passed the Freedom from Drone Surveillance Act
105-12 on May 30. The Senate gave its approval 52-1 in April and
quickly concurred with two House Amendments the day after House passage.
SB1587 now moves on to Gov. Pat Quinn for his signature.
The act does leave the door open for some drone use. The prime
exception allows for the use of drones “to counter a high risk of a
terrorist attack by a specific individual or organization if the United
States Secretary of Homeland Security determines that credible
intelligence indicates that there is such a risk.” In addition, the bill
would permit law enforcement agencies to use drones when attempting to
locate a missing person, as long as that flight was “not also
undertaking a criminal investigation.” It would also allow for review
of a crime scene and traffic crash scene photography. Any information
gathered by a drone would have to be destroyed within 30 days, unless
the information proved to contain evidence of criminal activity, or was
relevant to a trial or investigation.
The House amendments actually strengthened the bill.
The first tightened up admissibility
provisions. It now provides that if the court finds by a preponderance
of the evidence that a law enforcement agency used a drone to gather
information in violation of the information gathering limits in of the
Act, then the information shall be presumed to be inadmissible in any
judicial or administrative proceeding. It does allow that the State may
overcome this presumption by proving the applicability of a judicially
recognized exception to the exclusionary rule of the Fourth Amendment to
the U.S. Constitution or Article I, Section 6 of the Illinois
Constitution to the information. It also provides that nothing in the
Act shall be deemed to prevent a court from independently reviewing the
admissibility of the information for compliance with the aforementioned
provisions of the U.S. and Illinois Constitutions.
The second amendment deleted a provision that permitted the use of
drone by a law enforcement agency if the law enforcement agency
possesses reasonable suspicion that, under particular circumstances,
swift action is needed to prevent serious damage to property.
The Senate concurred with both amendments unanimously.
The Action Items section of this post has the following info of which we should all be aware:
While the legislation only limits drone use by state and local
government, it will seriously impact federal plans. At this stage in the
‘drone game,’ the feds are working hard behind the scenes to get states
to operate the drones for them. In fact, the federal government serves as the primary engine behind
the expansion of drone surveillance carried out by states and local
communities. The Department of Homeland Security issues large grants to
local governments so they can purchase drones. Those grants, in and of
themselves, represent an unconstitutional expansion of power. The goal? Fund a network of drones around the country and put the
operational burden on the states. Once they create a web over the whole
country, DHS steps in with requests for ‘information sharing.’ Bills
like these put a dent in this kind of long-term strategy. Without the
states and local communities operating the drones today, it’s going to
be nearly impossible for DHS plans to – take off.
Issues of concern to people who live in the west: property rights, water rights, endangered species, livestock grazing, energy production, wilderness and western agriculture. Plus a few items on western history, western literature and the sport of rodeo... Frank DuBois served as the NM Secretary of Agriculture from 1988 to 2003. DuBois is a former legislative assistant to a U.S. Senator, a Deputy Assistant Secretary of Interior, and is the founder of the DuBois Rodeo Scholarship.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
This is not nullification and it's very misleading. They leave the door open to constant spying by giving permission to use it to review crime scenes and traffic accidents. If there needs to be a warrant... how are they going to have that footage? Their only requirement is that it has to be destroyed in 30 days. Big deal - the fact remains that we cannot feel safe and secure in our own homes with the threat of being spied on by drones. These are weapons of war and in no circumstances should they be being used on Americans in our own country.
Post a Comment