by Myles Culbertson
The Western Conservationist
Movement is a consortium of organizations sharing common concerns about the
unnecessary removal of large masses federal lands to restricted status under
the guise of national monuments or wilderness.
In the case of the Organ Mountains–Desert Peaks declaration under the
Antiquities Act, a number of critical questions were ignored and otherwise
deflected, to be dealt with after the fact.
Not unexpectedly, none of these questions were addressed once the
half-million acre monument was formalized.
Grazing in this part of the
country has been an economic and cultural phenomenon since the era of
settlement that followed Spanish exploration of the region. Ranchers over the past several decades have
enjoyed a cooperative partnership with the Bureau of Land Management that has
demonstrably protected and preserved the beauty, diversity and sensitive
ecology of these lands. History confirms
that, in large transformations of federal lands to “protected status,” like the
Sonoran Desert and Escalante Grand Staircase monuments, those partnerships
become vulnerable to adverse legal actions that diminish and ultimately remove
the collaborative grazing relationships.
Regardless of numerous requests to recognize these culturally and
ecologically important grazing traditions as monument purposes, no government
effort to address the issue was ever initiated.
The Rio Grande valley is one of
the most productive agricultural areas in the country as well as a very
desirable region in which to live, giving rise to numerous communities, large
and small, up and down that valley. A
desert environment like ours can also be the setting for incredibly large and
destructive flash floods, and that kind of floodwater frequently threatens the
complex sensitive system of irrigation in the valley and its populated
communities. A recent example is the
2006 destruction that occurred in Hatch, NM.
Prevention is critically dependent upon access to the upper watershed in
order to build large and small structures to spread and slow such
flood-waters. Besides protecting the
valley, these types of projects preserve and improve the biological diversity
of the watershed. This type of
mitigation was not sufficiently included among the stated monument purposes,
and the safety of lands, property, infrastructure, and people are in question
as a result.
Regardless of the vague idea of a
buffer zone between the U.S./Mexico border and the vast monument area, no
assurance exists that this wholesale removal of land, restricting access by law
enforcement and homeland security personnel, will not result in a massive
corridor for human trafficking, drug smuggling, and other dangerous criminal
movement. The undeniable precedent of
ecological destruction, as well as danger to residents, tourists and local
citizens is easily found in the nearby Sonoran Desert Monument in Arizona. In that case, the ostensible “monument”
protection of a very sensitive ecology is actually contributing to its destruction. Specific language preserving access, road
infrastructure, and jurisdictions for federal, state, and county authorities
was intentionally excluded from the Organ Mountain Desert Peaks monument’s
purposes. As a result, the ecology and
people of Dona Ana County have been put at risk.
The foregoing describes only
three of a number of questions that remained intentionally unanswered in this
massive removal of federal lands under the guise of monument protection.
The Western Conservationist
Movement is not opposed to, and in fact supports, a monument encompassing the
Organ Mountains; however, what we have seen is a massive, far-reaching and
impactful abuse of the Antiquities Act reflected by the removal of half a
million acres of federal lands reaching all the way from the Organ Mountains to
Luna County. It is a vast,
ill-conceived, ill-advised, unaccountable action that threatens the culture,
natural productivity, and ecological balance of the region, as well as the
safety and security of its citizens.
No comments:
Post a Comment