Thursday, May 16, 2013

Endangered Species Act: On 40th anniversary, time to rethink how we protect wildlife

Many organizations are celebrating the 40th anniversary of the Endangered Species Act. One group of equity investors that will not be honoring the occasion is Google, NRG Solar and BrightSource. This trio has spent millions to keep a large solar thermal power plant from going dark before ever lighting a single home -- and all because of a tortoise listed as threatened under the species act. The plant is situated in the Mojave Desert -- an ideal spot for generating solar power but also prime habitat for the desert tortoise. To keep the installation from being derailed, investors have allocated $56 million -- and have already spent more than $130,000 per animal -- to care for and relocate the species. The private sector is not the only one footing the bill to keep this reptile burrowing beneath the Southwest. Among creatures protected by the act, the tortoise is one of the top recipients of tax dollars, which have been funneled through four states, seven military installations and four national parks with little success in advancing conservation goals. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service reports that the tortoise received nearly $190 million in tax-dollar support from 1996 to 2009, yet species population increased negligibly. The power plant itself received $1.6 billion in taxpayer-backed loan guarantees to help create green jobs and energy. In short, tax dollars appear to have been ineffective in protecting this species, and its latest The Endangered Species Act is expensive and ineffective in its reactive approach to conservation, which tends to penalize property owners once a species is already in a tailspin. A system of positive incentives for environmental stewardship, before formal listing under the act, could enhance species conservation by motivating more effective and less expensive habitat management.risk comes from a government-supported project. At the end of the day, we may have no tortoise, no green power, and no money...more

No comments: