Below is the grazing language in the NDAA. The bill is 1648 pages long, and this language starts on page 1187. You can see the entire bill here. I'm not sure we have gained much as this has been handled on a yearly basis through appropriations language. The enviros got 250,000 acres of Wilderness (45,000 in NM), plus more parks (including Valles Caldera) and wild & scenic rivers.
SEC. 3023. GRAZING PERMITS AND LEASES.
Section 402 of the Federal Land Policy and Manage-
ment Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C.
1752) is amended—
(1) in subsection (c)—
(A) by redesignating paragraphs (1), (2),
and (3) as subparagraphs (A),
(B), and (C), re-
spectively;
(B) by striking ‘‘So long as’’ and inserting
the following:
‘‘(1) RENEWAL
OF EXPIRING OR TRANSFERRED
PERMIT OR LEASE
.—During any period in
which’’;
and
(C) by adding at the end the following:
‘‘(2) CONTINUATION
OF TERMS UNDER NEW
PERMIT OR LEASE
.—The terms and conditions in
a
grazing permit or lease that
has expired, or was ter-
minated due to a grazing
preference transfer, shall
be continued under a new
permit or lease until the
date on which the Secretary
concerned completes
any environmental analysis
and documentation for
the permit or lease required
under the National En-
vironmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.) and other applicable
laws.
‘‘(3) COMPLETION
OF PROCESSING
.—As of the
date on which the Secretary
concerned completes the
processing of a grazing
permit or lease in accordance
with paragraph (2), the
permit or lease may be can-
celed, suspended, or
modified, in whole or in part.
‘‘(4) ENVIRONMENTAL
REVIEWS
.—The Sec-
retary concerned shall seek
to conduct environmental
reviews on an allotment or
multiple allotment basis,
to the extent practicable, if
the allotments share
similar ecological
conditions, for purposes of compli-
ance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)
and other applicable
laws.’’;
(2) by redesignating subsection (h) as sub-
section (j); and
(3) by inserting after subsection (g) the fol-
lowing:
‘‘(h) NATIONAL
ENVIRONMENTAL
POLICY
ACT
OF 1969.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL
.—The issuance of a grazing
permit or lease by the
Secretary concerned may be
categorically excluded from
the requirement to pre-
pare an environmental
assessment or an environ-
mental impact statement under
the National Envi-
ronmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.) if—
‘‘(A) the issued permit or lease continues
the current grazing
management of the allot-
ment; and
‘‘(B) the Secretary concerned—
‘‘(i) has assessed and evaluated the
grazing allotment associated
with the lease
or permit; and
‘‘(ii) based on the assessment and
evaluation under clause (i),
has determined
that the allotment—
‘‘(I) with respect to public land
administered by the Secretary
of the
Interior—
‘‘(aa) is meeting land health
standards; or
‘‘(bb) is not meeting land
health standards due to
factors
other than existing livestock
grazing; or
‘‘(II) with respect to National
Forest System land
administered by
the Secretary of Agriculture—
‘‘(aa) is meeting objectives
in the applicable land and
re-
source management plan; or
‘‘(bb) is not meeting the ob-
jectives in the applicable
land re-
source management plan due to
factors other than existing
live-
stock grazing.
‘‘(2) TRAILING
AND CROSSING
.—The trailing
and crossing of livestock
across public land and Na-
tional Forest System land and the implementation of
trailing and crossing
practices by the Secretary con-
cerned may be categorically
excluded from the re-
quirement to prepare an
environmental assessment
or an environmental impact
statement under the Na-
tional Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.).
‘‘(i) PRIORITY
AND TIMING
FOR COMPLETION
OF ENVIRONMENTAL
ANALYSES
.—The Secretary concerned, in
the sole discretion of the
Secretary concerned, shall deter-
mine the priority and timing
for completing each required
environmental analysis with
respect to a grazing allot-
ment, permit, or lease based
on—
‘‘(1) the environmental significance of the graz-
ing allotment, permit, or
lease; and
‘‘(2) the available funding for the environmental
analysis.’’.
No comments:
Post a Comment