By Michele Connelly
...The blatant disregard for any life but the glorious wolf is what has
produced the lack of success this program is plagued with. The original
poor wolf story in this series had a comment about wolves killing “the
occasional cow” and blaming this on ranchers unwilling to try new
techniques to protect their herds. Well, let’s see. The much vaunted red
electric fencing tape costs $8,000/mile and has the wallop of a tickle
to a child’s hand. A friend’s neighbor’s tot loved to play with it. Then
there are range riders, who unfortunately can’t ride at night, when
most of the attacks happen. The newest claim by the pro wolf livestock
experts is that because only 2% of cow deaths are from wolves that it’s
not a problem. Try telling that “occasional cow” story to the NM rancher
who lost 13 cows in one year to wolves. It’s this bending of facts,
using a national statistic that includes cows in stockyards and all over
wolfless cattle country as though it applies here, that delegitimizes
the program. How much of that rancher’s time will be spent trying to
verify wolf kills and getting reimbursed, replacing cows used to the
country with ones who aren’t? What happens to his/her bottom line when
the calves all have low birth weights due to stress from the mothers
being stalked, if not attacked?
...It’s always surprised me that the news organization for a land grant
university with a such a strong agricultural college publishes this one
sided nonsense. God loves cow families too. Where is the concern for the
cattle attacked and eaten alive, and their pain? Nope, it’s only the
poor wolf. If you actually wrote articles providing both sides of this
issue, now that would truly be a service.

No comments:
Post a Comment