Sunday, March 31, 2019

Cowgirl Sass & Savvy (revisited)


Strike up the fiddle, tune up the band

Julie Carter

This is a "do you remember" moment for those old enough to recall the days in rural America after World War II and young enough to remember what it was like for our parents.

Since the days of covered wagons and cattle drives, dancing in the country has been a social culture that brought levity to times of hard work and hard living.

History documents with a pen and photographs the moments of cowboy dancing around the campfire with the camp cookie still in his apron while a lively tune is belted out of a harmonica or strummed from a guitar.

After the war, when men from the country came home, changed by what they lived and what they had seen, and attempted to reconnect to the people and lives they had left behind, country dances made a way.

The cities moved into the bobby sox, loafer and jukebox era and was fueled by the music from Broadway musicals like Oklahoma, Annie Get Your Gun and South Pacific.

In the backwoods, hills and the plains of the West, the music culture was full of fiddle tunes that formed an important base for the contemporary versions of bluegrass, Western swing and country and Western.

I remember the community dances at the Grange Hall.

The neighbors would come, those that could play a musical instrument would and those that could sing, did.

Kids ran in and out the door while parents danced. Babies slept on pallets in the corner, or as my siblings and I did later in the night, bedded down in the back of a Studebaker station wagon.

There was a fiddle, a couple of guitars, piano, harmonica and occasionally an accordion to round out the music source.

My dad didn't always know the words to the songs, but he could yodel, so that was his contribution.

As the night wore on, and there was no closing time, the fun would kick up a notch as silly songs were created on the spot.

My parents courted going to country dances at a place that was no longer a town, but had a dancehall converted from an old one-room schoolhouse.

In later years, they rarely missed a dance that was held in the school gymnasium sponsored by the town firemen or the saddle club.

I grew up with the sounds of the Hanks (Snow, Locklin, Thompson and Williams) twanging in my head and feeding my love of the music. Jimmie Rodgers of "Honeycomb" and "Kisses Sweeter Than Wine" fame, Earnest Tubb, Farron Young, Marty Robbins, Jim Reeves, Ferlin Husky, Ray Price, Sonny James, Pasty Cline, Kitty Wells, Slim Whitman ... you get the idea.

The cowboys of that era tell about riding 10-12 miles to a dance, dancing all night, and riding back to the ranch to work. Some of them were the musical talent for the dance, some of them went to find the pretty girls, but they all went for the fun, the social and the levity their hard working lives needed.

When the trend moved the "party" to the honky tonks and bars, the dances held in halls, schools and barns dwindled and changed, except in the country where the families were held together by hard work, family values and simple lives.

I'm fortunate enough to still live in a place in the West where a country dance isn't all that foreign and yes, it is still a family affair.

If you need a refresher for your memories of those days, drop by Capitan, New Mexico on April 25. Head over to the fairgrounds and listen to the Joe Delk Band throw open the doors to those memories when life seemed just a little better.

The recipe for fun is still just as good today as it was then. Everything goes better with a country dance.

The End of a 140-year Waltz



Looking for any Haven
The End of a 140-year Waltz
The Cartels have It
By Stephen L. Wilmeth
            Let your conversation be always full of grace, seasoned with salt, so that you may know how to answer everyone. Col. 4:6
            Looking for any Haven
            The Westerner is reporting the illegal cross border arrivals are reaching 4,000 per day. Of course, that is the publicized number. The Border Patrol folks tell us that number is nowhere near what the real invasion figures are. That is the way it has always been. Those that deal with the crisis shake their heads and talk about the numbers while the opposition either says nothing or condemns the message as racist.
            We are hearing way too much about this racist nonsense.
            A school board member from the Bootheel told me Tuesday Lordsburg is receiving 100 illegals a day from El Paso to be processed and turned loose. The outcome is they are standing in line one last time before they melt away into the woodwork of the I-10 corridor.
            “I am glad I live on the border,” were his words. “The folks in Illinois and elsewhere are going to find out about all this mess when these people seek the welfare handouts in the heartland.”
            Certainly, his point is taken. One study shows that fully 70% of the illegal arrivals ungainfully populate the permanent welfare rolls.
            In El Paso the crescendo of arrivals is now eclipsing all the impact of then Border Patrol Chief, Silvestre Reyes’, Operation Hold the Line which was designed to halt illegal urban crossings in that border city a generation ago. It forced the illegal flows out into the rural areas where interdiction was enhanced.
            It worked.
            In fact, it worked so well similar programs were instituted in Arizona and California. Today, the new-found loophole of crashing entry barriers in the urban centers by sanctuary seekers is likely causing the reverse to happen. Evidence can be found in the closure of checkpoints on major traffic arteries because the agents manning them are being reassigned to process the hordes of urban arrivals.
            The drug cartels must be smiling.
            El Paso is also showing the affects of simply ignoring all concern for biosecurity. There are three cases of measles now at the city’s Andress High School. While American families are being criticized by the Center for Disease Control for forgoing childhood vaccinations, this government is opening gates to allow known populations of unvaccinated humans into our society.
            Is up really … down?
            The Cartels have It
            One of those CBP checkpoint closures is on I-10 west of Las Cruces.
            I know it very well. I pass through it on the way to the ranch. It has become part of the routine, and it isn’t just mine. Yesterday, I noticed a good number of the orange cones used to direct traffic flows have been decimated by trucks in the habit of exiting into the truck lane side of the facility. Being caught by surprise, those drivers have nailed many of those markers before correcting to stay in the normally vacant bypass lanes.
            Watching their reactions as they pass, those truckers invariably gaze northward at the near empty checkpoint no doubt wondering what the deal must be. What the public should have their eyes on is southward toward the border.
            It is there, from this most important drug infrastructure route of travel, this single checkpoint tacts as a beacon of warning when it is open. For there looms the Potrillo Mountains, America’s newest designated wilderness area.
            For those who follow this column, you should remember why these mountain ranges along the border can become so dangerous and act as a magnet to cross border violence and illicit trade. Cartels love them. They form protected smuggling corridors with their north/south natural drainages. They all have high points of observation. They are vast and largely owned by the federal government hence there are too few American eyes and ears permanently attached to the landscape. They are bounded on their north and south sides by hard surfaced access roads, and they have vast areas of sanctuaries of lands with restrictive access and land use dictates.
            What makes this one infinitely worse is the fact it is now designated wilderness. That means no legal vehicular traffic. There are 72 miles of “ways” in the Potrillos. These roads and two tracks have been continuously used by the public in mechanized and unrestricted access for generations. That equates to problems for drug runners who cannot afford to be observed. In this highly applauded gift by the Environmental Cartels to the Mexican Drug Cartels (and blessed without any debate by Congress), that now changes.  
The combined Cartels have it.
The End of a 140-Year Waltz
We look at this with abject incredulity.
This ranching community, that has created the only permanent water availability in the length and breadth of this desert environment, is on the verge of extinction. Dudley, Bill, Chip and the rest of us who are doormats in their absence are, to put it simply, walking dead men. We have made our case, but the reality is, we have no more ears to talk to or representation to depend upon.
It is clearly apparent this government has deemed our presence expendable.
That is a very difficult thing to get your mind around. I have an email from a Western Caucus staffer who explains that Chairman Gosar leads the charge against “opposition to (things like this)”, but “the train was moving on that bill and (they) didn’t have much support for stopping it”.
The train was moving!
There is no safe haven is there? Ours is a world that is no longer on any verge of chaos. It has fully been condemned to that state.
The end of this 140-year waltz is upon us.
Stephen L. Wilmeth is a rancher from southern New Mexico. “The view of the border to the south is now a borderless view to the south.”



Frank DuBois

Where does Wilmeth get the phrase The 140 Year Waltz? I believe it is from the tune The Last Cowboy Song, the opening lines of which are:

This is the last cowboy song
The end of a hundred year waltz


The tune was recorded in 1980, so now becomes an 140 year waltz.

Over at Vinyl Record Memories, Danny Sandrik wrote this about the song:

The Last Cowboy Song Lyrics was written by Ed Bruce and Ron Peterson and made it to #12 on the country charts in 1980.

Is this the Best Cowboy Song ever? Maybe not but it is an unforgettable sad song and tells a real cowboy story.

These lyrics, I believe, are some of Ed Bruce's best. The song discusses the disappearance of the American Old West and the values associated with it, and if ever lost will make us much the poorer because of it.

Let's hope the words in this song will always be remembered by someone who cares.

I've embedded the tune at the close of my remarks.

For me, however, the waltz is not over. The music is still playing and I'm still fighting. It may be while riding a wheel chair as a mount and using a computer as my weapon, but I'm still going to throw blows for what I think is right and on behalf of those people and principles that I respect.

Check around and you will find I was nobody to mess with when I could stand. Now all I can pound on is computer keys and on some days that is only one-handed, but rest assured I will keep pounding and entering the fray.

And I'm breaking in a new weapon. It's called a podcast. It will be me talking and interviewing others on current events. I may even have a co-host.  I figure my mouth will be the last thing to go. 67 million people a month now listen to podcasts. They download them to their phones and listen in their cars or trucks, at home and at work. I can embed the podcast on my blog, on Facebook, Twitter and on various sites that host podcasts. It is especially popular with the younger crowd and I am going take a shot at it.

Now back to the song. How do you define a cowboy? I could try, but nothing I could write can explain it better than this classified ad from the June 6, 1994 Austin American American-Statesman:  

  • Nature of Job: Worker's primary responsibility will be feeding, grazing and care of cattle and other livestock, as needed, and will be on call 24 hours/day, 7 days/week, Sundays & holidays included.
  • Worker will also perform related ranch work such as: gather livestock; assist load & unload feed; scatter bulls; check, repair, rebuild or maintain fences, water facilities and other ranch improvements; sort & ship livestock; assist with calving, castrating, branding, ear marking, vaccinating, administering medications, examining animals for diseases, parasites & injuries;
  • Check for and destroy noxious plant; and cut, transport, stack and burn prickly pear as forage for cattle.
  • Worker may also clean barns, tend horses or mules and chop & control brush.
  • Must be able to ride a horse in a safe manner and work livestock from horseback. Must be willing and able to live on ranch and to perform work with minimal supervision, alone or in small groups of other workers. Must be willing and able to work in all types of weather and must at all times be on call when not working. Must have basic working ability with fence tools, rope, tack and other common ranch implements. 
  • Must be able to find and maintain bearings to assigned work areas on the ranch. Must be reliable.
  • Salary And Benefits: Gross: $910 per month. Employer provides free housing, groceries, utilities, tools, supplies, equipment and worker's compensation insurance coverage. Generally, worker will prepare own meals. Reasonable transportation and meal expenses to the work site will be reimbursed....

     
    Please enjoy the song:

Eric Schwennesen - Shared Parenting


The title of this commentary bears a pause and a thought.

From a scientific and biological background, shared parenting sounds like an oxymoron, the sort of tongue-in- cheek lame humor to be expected from underchallenged graduate students after a notably dull staff meeting. How can you NOT share parenting unless you happen to be unicellular, a protist, or asexual? 

Needless to say the topic is far more -- dare I say pregnant?--than such a cursory skim, and so we plunge into the very muddy waters of current social (mis)behavior in search of enlightenment. It turns out that Shared Parenting is a subject which has long since been snatched away from science and placed in the capable hands of....politicians, elected judges and those paragons of human endeavor, lawyers. It arrived there by the usual contrivances and distortions of rule and law over order and common sense. So we ask: why? What could conceivably (sorry!) refute junior high school biology to the extent that jurisprudence must step in?

It turns out, hardly surprisingly, that our legal system thrives -- nay, exults, --in the spinoffs of marital conflict. A typical push for a legal divorce generates near-nuclear meltdown, creating a beaten zone of human suffering recognizable by our deployed EOD specialists. And where there's fire, nuclear or otherwise, there's opportunity, at least if you are part of our legal system. So why not tweak it, make it last a bit longer, wring it dry?

Enter Shared Parenting. Go back to biology. How many parents does it take, again? (Not counting the utterly bizarre recent evolutions of IVF and gender manipulations that would make a tyrannosaur blush). It takes two; one of each by the old standard. The "parenting" part of it is solid scientific ground: it indicates offspring. That's how we all got here. But the "shared"... Many a courtroom has batted that concept around through dozens of fee payments, and also weeks, on the premise that they, and they only, hold the wisdom to resolve "shared". The actual "parenting" is commanded to be silent in court.

...anybody wondering where the offspring get help in all of this...?

Back to biology, a discipline somewhat more seasoned at 540 million years and counting, than state law still somewhat malleable after 243 years or less. Evolution dictates parents; successful mammalian evolution has made it clear that shared parenting is also requisite. Common human decency -- if any-- also demands both parents. Ask their offspring.


Eric Schwennesen is a commercial beef rancher in the Mogollon Rim country. He grew up in Belgium, cowboyed in Nevada, and helped Navajos and many African peoples with rangeland conflicts for over 35 years. He recently published "The Field Journals: Adventures in Pastoralism" about his experiences.


I really don't understand Eric's concern about parenting and caring for children in our society. In the US today it is a simple and straight forward task to accomplish. As proof of my point and to soothe Eric's worries I present the Table of Contents of the US Dept. of HEW's child welfare manual.          

Child Welfare Policy Manual: Table of Contents

Click on a link below to view or print the questions in each section or subsection.
Printer-Friendly Version

spacer1.2A.1   Adoptive parents
spacer1.2A.2   Birth parents
spacer1.2A.3   Child's demographics
spacer1.2A.4   Court actions
spacer1.2A.5   Financial information
spacer1.2A.6   Placement
spacer1.2B.1   Case plan goal
spacer1.2B.2   Child's demographics
spacer1.2B.4   Financial elements
spacer1.2B.5   Foster family home
spacer1.2B.6   Outcome information
spacer1.2B.7   Placements
spacer1.2B.8   Principal caretaker
spacer2.1A.1   Confidentiality
spacer2.1A.2   Expungment
spacer2.1A.3   Open Courts
spacer2.1A.4   Public Disclosure
spacer2.1B   Appeals
spacer2.1D   Guardian Ad Litems
spacer2.1E   Reunification

2.3   Definitions
spacer3.1B   Age
spacer3.1C   Coordination
spacer3.1D   Fraud and Abuse
spacer3.1G   Room or Board
spacer3.1H   Training
spacer3.1I   Tribal

3.2   Data Collection
spacer3.2A   Data Elements
spacer3.2B   Outcome Measures

3.3   Fiscal
spacer3.3B   Allocations
spacer3.3C   Match
spacer3.3D   Non-supplantation
spacer3.3E   Use of Funds
spacer3.5A   Youth Eligibility
spacer3.5F   Use of Funds

6.3   CCWIS data
spacer6.3A   Federal data
spacer6.3B   State data
spacer6.3C   ICWA
spacer6.3D   NCANDS

6.4   Reporting
spacer6.4A   Federal reports

6.5   Data quality
spacer6.5E   Data quality plans

6.6   Data exchanges
spacer6.6A   Financial systems
spacer6.6F   Title IV-A systems
spacer6.6I   Title IV-D systems
spacer6.6J   Court systems
spacer6.6K   Education systems

6.10   Submission
spacer6.10A   Initial submission
spacer6.10B   On-going submission
spacer6.12A.1   Modularity
spacer6.12A.2   Plain language
spacer6.12A.3   Development standard
spacer6.12A.4   Reuse
spacer6.12B   Design waivers

6.13   CCWIS options

6.14   CCWIS reviews

6.15   Transition Period

6.16   Cost allocation
spacer6.16C.1   Development
spacer6.16C.2   Operations

6.17   Failure to comply
spacer6.17A   Suspension
spacer6.17B   Ending suspension
spacer6.17C   Recoupment

7.2   Confidentiality

7.4   Use of Funds
spacer8.1C   Calculating Claims
spacer8.1E   Contracting
spacer8.1F   Match Requirements
spacer8.1H   Training
spacer8.2A   Agreements
spacer8.2A.1   Interstate placements
spacer8.2A.2   Means test
spacer8.2B   Eligibility
spacer8.2B.1   Biological parents
spacer8.2B.5   Independent Adoptions
spacer8.2B.8   Medicaid
spacer8.2B.9   Redeterminations
spacer8.2B.11   Special needs
spacer8.2B.12   SSI
spacer8.2C   Interstate Compact
spacer8.2D   Payments
spacer8.2D.1   Allowable costs
spacer8.2D.2   Duration
spacer8.2D.4   Rates
spacer8.2D.5   Termination
spacer8.3A   Eligibility
spacer8.3A.2   Age
spacer8.3A.3   Biological parents
spacer8.3A.8a   child-care institution
spacer8.3A.8b   foster family home
spacer8.3A.8c   licensing
spacer8.3A.9   Reasonable efforts
spacer8.3A.9b   to prevent a removal
spacer8.3A.10   Redeterminations
spacer8.3B   Payments
spacer8.3B.1   Allowable costs
spacer8.3B.2   Rates
spacer8.3C.1   Case plans
spacer8.3C.2   Case review system
spacer8.3C.2c   permanency hearings
spacer8.3C.3   Foster care goals
spacer8.3C.4   Reasonable efforts
spacer8.3C.5   Trial home visit
spacer8.4A   AFDC Eligibility
spacer8.4B   Aliens/Immigrants
spacer8.4C   Child support
spacer8.4E   Confidentiality
spacer8.4G   Fair Hearings
spacer8.5A   Agreements
spacer8.5B   Eligibility
spacer8.5B.1   Siblings
spacer8.5B.2   Guardian requirements
spacer8.5C   Payments
spacer8.5C.1   Termination
spacer8.5D   Interstate
spacer8.6A.3   Reporting
spacer8.6B   Eligibility
spacer8.6B.3   Time-limited services
spacer8.6B.4   Age