Friday, October 12, 2007

Al Gore Wins Nobel Peace Prize Just as the buzz predicted, the winner of this year's Nobel Peace Prize is former Vice President of the United States Al Gore for spreading the word on global warming. The Norwegian Nobel Committee announced on Friday that Gore would share the prize with the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which also blames human activity for warming the planet. The Norwegian Nobel Committee said in awarding this year's peace prize, it wanted to highlight the importance of battling climate change. It praised the IPCC for its many reports over the years, which have "created an ever-broader informed consensus about the connection between human activities and global warming." The committee also praised Gore for being an early booster of human-caused global warming: "His strong commitment, reflected in political activity, lectures, films and books, has strengthened the struggle against climate change," the Nobel committee said. "He is probably the single individual who has done most to create greater worldwide understanding of the measures that need to be adopted." Nobel Prize contenders aren't supposed to campaign for the award, but Al Gore didn't need to do that -- "because he had the media doing it for him for at least a year-and-a-half," said the Business & Media Institute....
Gore Deserves Nobel Prize for Propaganda, Warming Skeptics Say Critics of Al Gore believe that the former vice president should not receive a Nobel Prize for his efforts regarding global warming - including his film "An Inconvenient Truth" - but should perhaps get an award for his efforts as a climate change propagandist. "The real 'inconvenient truth' is that Gore seems to have intentionally omitted it from his movie," Steve Milloy, publisher of JunkScience.com, charged in a news release on Thursday. Instead, the film presented "false facts" and major inaccuracies that fit the Democrat's personal agenda, he said. Milloy pointed to a ruling last week in a British court that "An Inconvenient Truth" contains at least nine material falsehoods and can be shown to students only if it is identified as containing "partisan political views" that promote only one side of the global warming argument. "It is plainly, as witnessed by the fact that it received an Oscar this year for best documentary film, a powerful, dramatically presented and highly professionally produced film," Judge Michael Burton said in his ruling. However, "it is now common ground that it is not simply a science film - although it is clear that it is based substantially on scientific research and opinion - but that it is a political film," the judge added. Then on Thursday, the BBC aired a report claiming that Gore knew his "alarmist" movie presented "false facts," because he feared any uncertainty in his film would only fuel opponents of global warming regulation. "If this is true," said Milloy, "then Al Gore should win the Nobel prize for propaganda." "The BBC report and the judge's ruling came as no surprise," he said....
UK Gov't Helps Teachers Deal With Gore's Climate Errors Teachers in Britain who show their students Al Gore's Oscar-winning climate change documentary must draw attention to inaccuracies in the movie -- or run afoul of a law that bans the promotion of partisan politics at school. A parent's legal effort to have "An Inconvenient Truth" banned from schools in England failed this week, but the High Court in London did say that in order not to breach legislation, screenings would have to be accompanied by appropriate guidance that points out the flaws in Gore's argument. Judge Michael Burton identified nine significant errors in the film. Copies of the documentary have been sent to all secondary schools in England, where it is shown to children aged 11-14. The Department for Children, Schools and Families' guidance now available to schools is a 60-page document that goes through the film segment by segment, pointing out where Gore's assertions "do not accord with mainstream scientific opinion," and where further input from teachers will be needed. Teachers are told to bear in mind that the documentary "promotes partisan political views," and to be careful that they themselves do not promote those views....
Think tank: Withdraw Gore film's Oscar On the eve of Al Gore's award of the Nobel Peace Prize, a think tank wrote the president of the Academy Awards asking that the Oscar given to his film "An Inconvenient Truth" be taken back in response to a British High Court ruling that found 11 serious inaccuracies in the documentary. Muriel Newman, director of the New Zealand Centre for Political Research, told Academy President Sid Ganis and Executive Director Bruce Davis "the situation is not unlike that confronting sports bodies when their sports stars are found to be drug cheats." "In such cases, the sportsmen and women are stripped of their medals and titles, with the next place-getter elevated," she said, according the Australian Associated Press. "While this is an extremely unpleasant duty, it is necessary if the integrity of competitive sport is to be protected. "The truth, as inconvenient as it is to Al Gore, is that his so-called documentary contained critical distortions that are quite contrary to the principles of good documentary journalism," Newman said. "Good documentaries should be factually correct. Clearly this documentary is not."....
Gore's Nobel boosts talk of White House run Former Vice President Al Gore was named joint winner of the Nobel Peace Prize on Friday for his environmental activism, likely increasing pressure from his supporters for him to enter the Democratic race for the White House. Sources say Gore will resist entreaties but will continue to tease by not ruling it out. Just this week, an unofficial "draft Gore" movement bought a full-page ad in The New York Times — a move that succeeded in amping up the buzz among pundits and operatives. The announcement boosts Gore's leverage with his party's presidential candidates and the next White House, if a Democrat wins. Now he and his agenda will command more attention....
White House "happy" for Gore's Nobel Peace Prize The White House praised former U.S. Vice President Al Gore and the U.N. climate panel on Friday for winning the Nobel Peace Prize for their work to raise awareness of the threat of global warming. "The president learned about it this morning," said White House spokesman Tony Fratto, who is traveling with Bush in Florida. "Of course he's happy for Vice President Gore and happy for the international panel on climate change scientists who also shared the peace prize." "Obviously, it's an important recognition and we're sure the vice president is thrilled," added Fratto, who said he did not know of plans for Bush to make a congratulatory call to Gore. Gore, a Democrat, has been a vocal critic of the environmental policies of President George W. Bush, a Republican who beat him narrowly in a disputed presidential election result in 2000....

2 comments:

Kanani said...

"He is probably the single individual who has done most to create greater worldwide understanding of the measures that need to be adopted."

I just don't think that's true.

Frankly, I don't think a vast majority saw that film. Go to a small town in Southern Utah, or one in Northern New Mexico. Did they see it? Probably not. But are they aware of the need to save our resources? I'd take a guess, yes. But it didn't come from Gore.

Sorry, I've been away. I'm up to my neck in other things right now!

Frank DuBois said...

Hope you saw my response on Ruidoso.