Thursday, July 30, 2009

A List Of Concerns - The Food Safety Bill

The Farm-To-Consumer Legal Defense Fund has this to say about the bill:

The bill imposes burdensome requirements while not specifically targeting the industrial food system and food imports, where the real food safety problems lie. Small farms and local food processors are part of the solution to food safety, yet HR 2749 takes a one-size-fits-all approach subjecting local producers to the same regulations as industrial firms. The bill gives FDA much more power than it has had in the past while making the agency less accountable for its actions.

Here is their list of concerns:

1. GEOGRAPHIC QUARANTINE
HR 2749 would give FDA the power to order a quarantine of a geographic area, including "prohibiting or restricting the movement of food or of any vehicle being used or that has been used to transport or hold such food within the geographic area." Under this provision, farmers markets and local food sources could be shut down, even if they are not the source of the contamination. The agency can halt all movement of all food in a geographic area.
2. WARRANTLESS SEARCHES*
HR 2749 would empower FDA to make warrantless searches of the business records of small farmers and local food producers, without any evidence whatsoever that there has been a violation. Even farmers selling direct to consumers would have to provide the federal government with records on where they buy supplies, how they raise their crops, and a list of customers.
3. TRACING SYSTEM
HR 2749 charges the Secretary of Health and Human Services with establishing a tracing system for food. Each "person who produces, manufactures, processes, packs, transports, or holds such food" would have to "maintain the full pedigree of the origin and previous distribution history of the food," and "establish and maintain a system for tracing the food that is interoperable with the systems established and maintained by other such persons." The bill does not explain how far the traceback will extend or how it will be done for multi-ingredient foods. With all these ambiguities, it's far from clear how much it will cost either the farmers or the taxpayers.
4. SEVERE PENALTIES
HR 2749 creates severe criminal and civil penalties, including prison terms of up to 10 years and/or fines of up to a total of $100,000 for individuals.
5. REGISTRATION FEE
HR 2749 would impose an annual registration fee of $500 on any "facility" that holds, processes, or manufactures food. Although "farms" are exempt, the agency has defined "farm" narrowly. And people making foods such as lacto-fermented vegetables, cheeses, or breads would be required to register and pay the fee, which could drive beginning and small producers out of business during difficult economic times.
6. CROP REGULATION
HR 2749 would empower FDA to regulate how crops are raised and harvested. It puts the federal government right on the farm, dictating to our farmers.

1 comment:

Natalie said...

Very high quality focuses you listed here in this post. Very thoughtful, meaningful and significant considering the global food safety issue. The concerns including geographic quarantine, warrantless searches, tracking system, sever penalties, registration fees, crop regulation, oh all the explanation were able to bring a thoughtful light of the issue. I appreciate your brilliant thoughts and list. Right this moment I can remember a community named Authentium.io that is a pioneering open-source platform with a shared vision to design and build an ecosystem of DAO-like Decentralized Autonomous Supply Chain Organizations (DASCO’s) which are engaging their efforts to remove powerful centralized authorities from global food supply chains. Anyway, I would like to say my cordial thanks for sharing such an important concerning list online.