Wednesday, March 02, 2011

Future of Southwest’s Mexican Gray Wolf Uncertain

Like many outfitters and ranchers in Catron County, New Mexico — one of the counties of the Sagebrush Rebellion of the 70s and 80s — Tom Klumker wants Mexican gray wolves out of the Gila National Forest, where the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has been releasing the endangered wolves into the wild since 1998. “They’ve been successful at wiping out a bunch of livestock and hurting a bunch of ranchers,” Klumker said. “As a result, they’ve made a big difference on the livestock industry in Catron County. I don’t think we need them. The early settlers worked very hard to get rid of both the wolf and the grizzly for a very good reason.” Klumker, based in Glenwood, N.M., is a board member of the vehemently anti-wolf Americans for the Preservation of Western Environment, or APWE, and the Southwest Director of the New Mexico Council of Outfitters and Guides, a group now part of a new Fish and Wildlife Service Mexican Gray Wolf Recovery Planning Team. The team will create a new recovery plan that may eventually lead the way to a healthy and sustainable population of Mexican wolves in New Mexico and Arizona. Caren Cowan, executive director of the New Mexico Cattle Growers Association, said the lagging Mexican wolf numbers show the program isn’t working, especially as ranchers continue to deal with wolves killing cattle. Officially, there were 185 confirmed cattle depredations from wolves from 1998 through 2009 in New Mexico and Arizona, said Arizona Department of Game and Fish wolf biologist Jeff Dolphin. But the real number of depredations, Cowan said, is difficult to nail down because many ranchers fear the level of proof needed to confirm that a wolf killed a cow is so high that they don’t bother to report a suspected killing...more

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

The fact that the courts have not found in favor of the livestock producer should be a wakeup call. The only way to win this war with the greens is through the political process. Instead of spending money on more court cases, spend it on supporting the politicians who will defund the wolf project and get rid of the ESA. Then we will be able to win this war.
When Parsons bases the good of the wolf pack on improved Aspen stands his biological credentials should be revoked! What nonsense! The health of Aspen stands comes and goes without wolves. Reducing elk numbers through hunting adds to the local economy and will help Aspen stand in the winter range. We don't get any benefit from wolves eating elk.