With all the focus on public employees and budget cuts, it’s worth remembering the National Park Service and U.S. Forest Service employees who work physically and emotionally demanding jobs and like other public employees have for years been in the crosshairs of political and fiscal fights. Despite serious risk to their careers, they have stood up for their values. Many rangers and government scientists think forest management decisions are being driven by dollars and political influence rather than what is really best for the forests. But especially since park and forest service jobs are constantly being slashed for budget reasons, and since local officials have much control over these employees, speaking out can be dangerous. The groups Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility and Forest Service Employees for Environmental Ethics advocate strenuously both for the rights of individual park and forest service employees and for larger values around public commons and natural resources. They’ve often defended employees against retribution from higher-ups. PEER describes its mission in part as forcing agencies to "deal with the message, not the messenger."...more
The discretionary spending part of the federal budget is about to take a big hit. That will include all the land management agencies and we can expect to see more articles like this.
Issues of concern to people who live in the west: property rights, water rights, endangered species, livestock grazing, energy production, wilderness and western agriculture. Plus a few items on western history, western literature and the sport of rodeo... Frank DuBois served as the NM Secretary of Agriculture from 1988 to 2003. DuBois is a former legislative assistant to a U.S. Senator, a Deputy Assistant Secretary of Interior, and is the founder of the DuBois Rodeo Scholarship.
Tuesday, August 23, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I couldn't help but notice the agency emphasis on "values". It can be demonstrated that Forest Service, Park Service, BLM, USFWS, BOR, and a number of other alphabet agencies have consitently set lofty sounding goals for natural resources which have not been met. Failure has been rewarded with even bigger budgets and lessa accountability. Part of the unrealistic and unattainable planning/goal setting is due to their dependence on values and feelings instead of facts.
It looks a lot like the agencies are about to pay the price of several decades of "fact free science" and they don't like how that "feels".
Last time I remember hearing about PEER in the press, they were making a fuss about books in Grand Canyon's bookstores, or something. A discredited organization claiming to speak for the Park Service, but actually speaking for a small radical minority seeking to turn federal resources to their own use.
Post a Comment