January 2012 saw the release of new USDA school lunch rules,
crafted in the wake of the passage of the Healthy and Hunger-Free
Kids Act of 2010. The new rules were meant to do everything from
combating obesity to educating kids about healthier food
choices. The rules add more fruits and vegetables to USDA-provided school
lunches in public schools; cap salt, fat, and calories; and replace
white flour with whole wheat flour. The new rules also
added to the cost of school lunch. Supporters heaped praises on the new rules after their
release. First Lady Michelle Obama, who
"championed" the rule changes,
claimed they would make sure “our hard work [as parents is not]
undone each day in the school cafeteria.” Margo Wootan, director of nutrition policy at the Center for
Science in the Public Interest, gushed
the new rules were the “best ever.” The headline to New York University Prof. Marion Nestle’s
Atlantic
column on the new rules, which she claimed had been met with
“near-universal applause”? “The USDA’s New School Nutrition
Standards Are Worth Celebrating.” Earlier this month, the start of the school year around the
country gave the new rules their first test. Results have not been
pretty. Seventy percent of students at one Wisconsin high school
boycotted USDA school lunches. As one student at the school
told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, the changes have
meant the food is “worse tasting, smaller sized and higher
priced.” Across the country in Connecticut, a student
petition protesting the smaller portion sizes resulted in the
school district abandoning the rules after “only a few days.” Even in schools where this sort of open insurrection isn’t yet
evident, some reports show students are voting against the new USDA
rules with their parent-provided dollars...more
Wish these kids could vote.
No comments:
Post a Comment