Issues of concern to people who live in the west: property rights, water rights, endangered species, livestock grazing, energy production, wilderness and western agriculture. Plus a few items on western history, western literature and the sport of rodeo... Frank DuBois served as the NM Secretary of Agriculture from 1988 to 2003. DuBois is a former legislative assistant to a U.S. Senator, a Deputy Assistant Secretary of Interior, and is the founder of the DuBois Rodeo Scholarship.
Thursday, October 18, 2012
Arizona voters face an IQ test on public lands
Arizona voters face two land-related ballot measures this November,
and together, they reveal not just the state’s split personality but
that of the West as well. You can think of Proposition 119 as a respectable Dr. Jekyll, a 19th
century gentleman who wants the state and federal government to exchange
land to improve management and to protect the “mission readiness” of
the state’s military bases. By carefully consolidating state and federal
land, Prop. 119 would also promote solar energy while protecting public
lands for conservation and public use. The measure requires an
extraordinary degree of openness, including a requirement that the
voters must specifically approve future land exchanges. Proposition 120, however, can be thought of as Robert Louis Stevenson’s
sinister character, Mr. Hyde. This measure authorizes Arizona to seize
federal lands in the state, excluding Indian reservations and “land for
the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dock-yards and other needful
buildings,” quoting the U.S. Constitution. And where are these
dockyards in Arizona? Arizona already struggles to manage 9.3 million acres of state trust
land –– 12.7 percent of the state. That land’s management is a tribute
to the Herculean efforts of Land Commissioner Maria Baier and her
recently slashed staff. The Arizona Legislature cut the Land
Department’s annual general fund appropriation from $29 million in 2006,
to $1.2 million in 2012. That’s not a typo. Appropriations dropped from
$3.13 per acre in 2006, to 13 cents per acre today. Compare that to
the Bureau of Land Management, which spends somewhere around $3.79 per
acre, and the National Park Service, which spends more than $20 per
acre. And Prop. 120 would put the Legislature in charge of the Grand
Canyon!...more
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Your blog is a great one.
intelligence test quiz
intelligence tests online
Post a Comment