The Cost of Insanity
Wild Horse Havens
Ecotourism coming to a pasture near you
By Stephen L. Wilmeth
His original
name was Choctaw.
We called
him Chalky probably because it fit him better. He was a flea bitten gray with
coal black feet. Since only kids rode him by the time I came along, there was no
good reason to shoe him, but he probably didn’t need shoeing anyway. I wish now
I had known what I was looking at when I was around him with the opportunity to
study his feet.
He was the
cause of my first real horse wreck. I was with Grampa one day down the Mangus
and he had fallen with me. I was laying there under him when Grampa came riding
back up over the creek bank.
“Looks like
you’re in a bad place there, son!” he had said.
Chalky had
wallowed around and got up without more damage, but I was running on
adrenaline. I remounted and within seconds my head was spinning.
“I don’t
feel so good,” I told my grandfather.
“Well, go
on to the house then,” he said.
I can
remember heading back up the road to the house before everything went black.
The next thing I knew I was waking up lying on my back looking skyward. The old
horse had dutifully stopped and was assessing me. His muzzle was in my face. I
remember smelling him.
My head was
clearing by the time I got to the house and unsaddled. Grandma greeted me,
diagnosed the situation and had me lay down in the shade. She brought me a Pepsi
to drink … her remedy for lots of ailments.
Chalky was
the only horse from wild horse origin I knew personally in my youth. Grampa and
Tom McCauley had trapped a bunch of remnant wild horses at the pot holes in Davis Canyon
and roped him as a colt. They broke him and he had lived a long and productive
life. He had long been a family pet. Every Wilmeth grandchild of my generation
learned to ride on that horse.
He had
fallen not by tendency, but by frailty of age.
The end of
his life came when Grampa found him hung up in a fence going out onto the Forest . He put him down. He was 31.
We were
heart broken.
Wild horses
Today,
there are an estimated 70,000 wild horses in the West largely on federal lands.
More than half are in Nevada .
Some 37,000 of them are free
roaming. The others are in jail … that is they are in what the primary
governing land management agency, the BLM, terms ‘short term corrals’ or
‘long-term pasture’.
By their
own admission, the agency reveals the horses are on a growth path that is
clearly unsustainable. They said the same thing back in 2009 when they told
Congress they would have the free roaming population down to 29,500 by 2011 if
Treasury would just spring for $57.4 million to fuel their horse management
efforts for the upcoming fiscal year. Depending on how you want to calculate
that expanding black hole, that equated to $831.88 annually per living wild
horse or $1,793.75 for every animal incarcerated.
That
promise, of course, went the direction of the sucking sound and today’s
dynamics are on a glide path to hit $1,304.64 and $2,468.24, respectively.
Should we have expected anything different from our government?
The agency
has a plan, though.
Their
strategy continues to herald the adoption process where the price point of
adoption reaches the trigger point of acceptance rather than actual value of
the horses. That program has put 100,000 horses over the last decade into
backyards and households that are not the best alternatives for once wild, free
roaming animals.
The heart
of the current plan has more advocacy appeal. It consists of three components.
Those detailed plans are fertility control, the establishment of new wild horse
preserves, and the acceleration of special designations for ‘selected treasured
herds’ in the West.
Congress is
being assured that wild horses on western lands will come into balance with
their ranges.
In the
matter of fertility control, the plan is to put mares on a drug plan. The
horses are going to get free birth control. A review of the history of the
birth control tests that drove this concept reveals that conception dropped
from 80% to 28% in 2006. In the successive two year periods thereafter, it
produced similar decreases of 84% to 38% and 69% to 29%.
That sounds alright other than the
fact the process has to be done year after year and the Fed horse wranglers
might never gather a wishful target of 80% of their horses and need a 90%
capture rate to make the process hit its mark.
The second
stage of the strategy is to expand federal domain out of the West and establish
horse parks in the East and Midwest . The
Secretary has assured that acquisition of these lands would only be ‘productive
grasslands’. Furthermore, it would be “an excellent opportunity to showcase
these historic animals with the potential for boosting eco-tourism in rural
communities”.
In addition
to the necessary increase in annual operational funding of the horse program,
the agency also wants money to acquire those expanding productive grasslands.
The last annual request was for $42.5 million.
It seems the
Feds are intent to add wild horse parks to their growing array of national monuments,
national conservation areas, areas of critical environmental concern, national
forests, wild and scenic rivers, and, of course, the gold standard of all …
wilderness.
The
‘treasured herd’ assignment alternative seems to be a contradiction of the
expansion of horse parks into areas east of the 100th Meridian . In this
expansion of budget, the Secretary is going to designate recognition status of
certain showcase herds. By such designations, western rural communities in the
overpopulated, depleted ranges of those resident populations will start
enjoying expanded eco-tourism just like their eastern counterparts!
Of course,
the treasured herd designations will require hiring some kind of specialist the
Feds reference by the acronym FTE. Certainly that FTE will have to have a
staff, gooseneck trailer depository and field headquarters as well. He or she
will be assigned the duty of population inventory, fertility control, other
population management actions, removal operations, administering adoptions, sale
of excess animals, and … the care of those horses that are incarcerated.
This all sounds
like the original dictate of the legislation that has been driving this whole
equine welfare program from the onset … the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burro
Act of 1971.
Insanity management
When the
Act was passed, Congress had been convinced by the wild horse advocates that,
without action, the free roaming herds would become extinct. The tide was
turned on any fear of disappearance, and, the herds not only increased, they
bred right through the carrying capacity and the promises by the managing
agencies.
Much of the money spent today is in
breach of the law. Section 1333 of the Act mandates the Secretary of Interior
“shall immediately remove excess animals from the range so as to achieve
appropriate management levels” when available information to him determines
overpopulation exists in any given area.
The intention is this Act, along
with similar environmental acts passed by Congress and assigned to the cabinet
level secretaries for implementation and management, is altered, modified,
adjusted, ignored, or reinterpreted constantly through agency management and
regulation creep.
This is another example of the
American citizen being pillaged by special interests and agencies that exist in
a parallel universe without substantive oversight from any authority. Of
course, they always complain about budget.
Last week BLM made the announcement
they were going to remove only “1300 mustangs and burros from range across the
West this summer” because of budget constraints and overflowing holding pens. Even
this statement reeks of double speak. The entire matter was predicated on the
plea to maintain “these symbols of the historic and pioneer spirit of the West”
in a wild free-roaming state. Over crowded jails don’t seem to pass muster
within the spirit of the law.
What about the matter of killing an
animal for the unwritten contract of humane and ethical treatment of a natural
system?
The protectionists turn crimson with
those words. Ultimately, that is exactly where this leads. In the fine print of
the BLM has disclosed the agency intends to adjust sex ratios within the herd.
That means one thing and that is the termination of lives of mares for the
benefit of the stallions.
My goodness … wait until the
feminists get that message!
Stephen
L. Wilmeth is a rancher from southern New
Mexico .
No comments:
Post a Comment