In golf clubs, gated communities and other housing developments across the United States, tens of thousands of families like the Davidsons have in recent years moved into new homes where their developers or homebuilders, with little or no prior disclosure, kept all the underlying mineral rights for themselves, a Reuters review of county property records in 25 states shows. In dozens of cases, the buyers were in the dark.
- In most states, sellers aren't legally required to disclose to home buyers whether they are severing the mineral rights to a property.
- Builders sometimes flag the move in sales contracts or deeds and other documents they are required to file with local authorities.
- But buyers don't necessarily review their paperwork very closely, especially if, as real estate agents say happens often, they don't hire a lawyer to help them with the transaction.
- Severed rights are usually not factored into tax assessments.
- Thus homeowners who don't own their mineral rights often end up paying just as much in property taxes as those who do -- even though their properties are worth less.
Source: Michelle Conlin and Brian Grow, "U.S. Builders Hoard Mineral Rights under New Homes," Reuters, October 9, 2013.
Link
1 comment:
Is this a controversy? i have owned homes in three states and in no case did I own the mineral rights. This so called "split estate" is a fairly common practice in California and Alaska. But, if homebuyers do not exercise due dillegence, they may find themselves surprised when the excavator shows up since reasonable access to the subsurface estate usually goes hand in hand with mineral rights.
Post a Comment