Issues of concern to people who live in the west: property rights, water rights, endangered species, livestock grazing, energy production, wilderness and western agriculture. Plus a few items on western history, western literature and the sport of rodeo... Frank DuBois served as the NM Secretary of Agriculture from 1988 to 2003. DuBois is a former legislative assistant to a U.S. Senator, a Deputy Assistant Secretary of Interior, and is the founder of the DuBois Rodeo Scholarship.
Friday, January 03, 2014
Enviros, beetle larvae and black backed woodpeckers could stop harvest on burned out area
Wood boring beetle larvae could trump human beings. That’s
the possible end game of a controversy raging over what to do with a
portion of the 400 plus square miles of forest burned by last year’s Rim
Fire near Yosemite National Park. The U.S. Forest Service wants
to harvest burned trees from 29,648 acres or roughly 30 square miles
within the Stanislaus National Forest. That’s about 11 percent of the
300,000 plus acres that were charred in the third largest fire in
California history. If harvested in a timely manner before the
wood deteriorates further, the charred trees would yield an estimated
one billion board feet of useable lumber. That is enough lumber to frame 625,000 new homes averaging 2,400 square feet in size. The Forest Service would use part of the proceeds to fund a massive replanting effort. The move is being opposed by some environmentalists. Chad
Hanson — a forest and fire ecologist with the John Muir Project —
believes logging and replanting are the absolute worst things that could
be done on forestland scarred by the fire. The main reason is
that it disrupts the natural post fire ecological system that helps wood
boring beetle larvae thrive in greater numbers. Those beetle larvae in
turn help support the black backed woodpeckers. It takes 200 to 300
acres of burned out forest to support a pair of black backed
woodpeckers. That means the area in question
could ultimately provide meals for 600 woodpeckers. The entire 47 square
miles would provide a buffet for 6,000 woodpeckers. The basic question is what is more important: Homes for 1,562,500 people (based on 2.5 people per home) or 600 woodpeckers? Remember there would still be enough post fire habitat to support upwards of 5,400 black backed woodpeckers. Foes
of the Forest Service’s harvesting plan intend to use the federal
environmental review process to slow down the effort. In doing so, they
would effectively make harvesting the burned wood a mute point as any
significant delay would deteriorate the salvage quality of potential
lumber. That’s why Congress Tom McClintock, R-Elk Grove, has
introduced legislation to suspend the environmental review for the
Forest Service plan...more
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Yep, they just want to harvest 11 percent of the burned area...seems reasonable e to me...and the article has a good point....man is part of the environment....we to often take ourselves out of the equation...there is just so much extremism right now that it is hard for the FS to find a good balance.
Post a Comment