Those who watch the Oscars need to understand the song that receives
the Oscar for best song may not deserve the honor. The Motion Picture
Academy arbitrarily rescinded the nomination of the song "Alone Yet Not Alone" from the best song category. According to a review
"ALONE YET NOT ALONE tells the inspiring story of Barbara and Regina
Leininger and their journey of faith and survival during the French
& Indian war in 1755. Captured by the Allegheny Indians in a raid on
their home and transported over 300 miles of wilderness to Ohio, the
sisters are sustained only by their abiding trust in God, and their hope
of escape against all odds to be reunited with their family." The
Leiningers had immigrated to the British Colonies in search of religious
freedom. During the French and Indian War, the French paid the
Alleghenies and others to attack British settlements. The British saw
nothing wrong with kidnapping people from Africa.
Academy president Cheryl Boone Isaacs, who has helped to
market studio films, hypocritically claims that the action was justified
by an email song composer Bruce Broughton sent to those who help to
nominate songs. However, she apparently sees nothing wrong with
allowing major studios to run expensive campaigns for the awards. Broughton notes
that "major studios and many independents send out DVD screeners of
their films which list all of the eligible contestants on the jacket –
including the songwriters – and follow up with invitations to
screenings, meet-‘n-greets, sometimes including a fully produced,
non-film version CD of the song, something that is disallowed by Academy
rules. When major studios “campaign,” there’s no way a small
independent can adequately compete. And there’s nothing anonymous about
any of it." Conservative groups are blaming the withdrawal of the Oscar
nomination for best song from "Alone Yet Not Alone" on anti-Christian
prejudice. Although the studios could have benefited from religious
prejudice among those in charge of the Oscars, the studio executives
are more likely motivated by pure greed. They want the awards closed
to outside competitors who cannot afford to make big budget movies.
The action is evidence that the Oscars are just a public relations
gimmick. The studios may have been worried that a "Cinderella"
candidate might have an advantage over their big budget songs. By
giving into the studios the Academy missed a major opportunity to
indicate that the Oscars are not just based on money. Having a true
Cinderella candidate would have generated a lot of positive publicity
for the Academy and helped draw more viewers for the Oscar program...more
No comments:
Post a Comment