The part about being "empowered" to enforce state law caught my attention. Toward the end of the Albq. Journal article was this:
Also, some Rio Arriba County residents have complained about
arrests on state charges that they say Forest Service agents have no
right to make without being deputized by a local sheriff. Special Agent in Charge Robin L. Poague, of the Southwestern
Region of the U.S. Forest Service, said in Monday’s news release:
“Federal regulations authorize Forest Service officials to enter orders
permitting Forest Service officers to issue federal violation notices
for violations of the state motor vehicle code on National Forest System
lands and roads. “This ensures consistent enforcement of the motor vehicle
code throughout the state and across agencies. The current order
authorizing Forest Service officers to issue federal violation notices
in the Carson National Forest has been in place since May 2012. The
prosecution of Martinez on this DUI charge was initiated pursuant to
this authority.”
My understanding of state law is the same as the residents. Some feds are cross-commissioned by state statute, such as the FBI and U.S. Marshalls, and the rest had to go through the Sheriff. I haven't looked at the law in years, but it kind of makes you wonder if the Forest Service is violating state law to be able to enforce state law. The sentence was handed down by a Federal judge in a federal court. Was he found guilty of violating the federal regulation or the state statute? If it is the state statute, why wasn't this done in state court?
No comments:
Post a Comment