Government vehicles and personnel outside of the Bundy ranch / Cliven and Carol Bundy |
My brother Wayne Hage drove to
the Bundy Ranch last night with a friend to provide emotional support to Cliven
during this federal raid on his ranch and encourage them to keep a cool
head. However, I am very concerned about the safety of Wayne and the
Bundy family.
Here is the problem. The
BLM and BLM attorney out of Sacramento, Nancy Zahedi, are running this entire
law enforcement action. The Sheriff has told Mr. Bundy he is staying
“neutral”. As you are aware, every land law passed by Congress has
reserved civil and criminal jurisdiction to the states unless they have a
specific session of exclusive jurisdiction by the State legislature under
Article I, Sec. 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution. The lands at issue here
are held in “proprietorial interest only” jurisdiction, wherein the federal
government has the same status as “any other land owner.”
I spoke with the Bundy’s and my
brother this morning. Here is what is happening on the ground according
to them. They said over 40 government vehicles including BLM, Park
Service, Homeland Security and FBI passed by their property this morning, not
counting rent-a-cowboys, and other bureaucrats that are elsewhere on the
ranch. They understand from a Mesquite city police officer and their
personal friend (whose department has been ordered by Clark Co. Sheriff
Gillespie to stand down) that the Bundy’s should not be deceived; that the BLM
has hired special forces wearing BLM gear to run this operation. Also, at
a private airport near the Bundy ranch, photos were taken of a military
helicopter landing and military men in full military gear disembarking.
This possibly invokes the Treaty of Posse Comitatus. The Bundy’s say
their ranch is completely surrounded by federal forces on the hills around the
ranch.
Clearly the Clark Co. Sheriff
has committed malfeasance of office by allowing federal employees impersonating
law enforcement officers to breach the peace in his county and not running this
impoundment himself under state law. I sit on the Board of Agriculture
and we have brand inspectors situated in the middle of this fracas for whom
I am concerned. However, as far is Congress is concerned, I believe the
time has come to open investigative hearings into these land management agencies
and their widespread unlawful law enforcement activities.
My questions are these:
Under what authority are these bureaucrats receiving appropriations for law
enforcement guns, equipment and manpower? Under what authority are they
conducting these activities? These same questions apply to the USFWS raid
on Gibson Guitar. As you are well aware, Congress has only granted
federal law enforcement authority in very limited instances.
On the local level we obviously
need Sheriffs like Sheriff DeMeo in the neighboring county of Nye to stand up
to these thugs. But the reality is in the west that the lowest level
federal employee can waltz into practically any office from Nevada’s Governor
on down and claim they have supremacy under the Supremacy Clause and
Territorial Clause and our local officials will most often submit, including
the Governor. We for all practical purposes have a territorial governor,
a sheriff who instead of serving at the pleasure of the folks who elected him,
serves at the orders of the BLM. It goes downhill from there. These
federal agencies need to be disarmed. Unless the United States and
individual states intend to continue down this slippery slope of acquiescing to
an unelected, armed, federal police force operating under an unlawful assertion
of power, then I believe we had better get control of this situation
soon. We need everyone to follow the law INCLUDING federal
employees. These out-of-control federal land management bureaucrats are
an obvious place to start.
I have attached several papers
addressing the issue of the Supremacy Clause and federal law enforcement
authority. I have additional information on this subject which I am happy
to provide.
Regards,
Ramona Hage Morrison
1 comment:
Cliven Bundy is one of a long line of Western State ranchers who have been fighting the feds (BLM and USFS) for decades over their historically protected use of the public land and water for cattle grazing. Historically, many court cases have ruled in favor of the ranchers and laws have been enacted to protect their rights. The feds and their legal machine just ignore this fact. They are killing the ranches and the families that own them, one at a time, with their rules and unconstitutional tactics. States have sovereignty in this matter but are being intimidated by the fed's hammer. The current crisis is just a repeat of the Nevada Wayne Hage battle that started in the 90's, and was just adjudicated in 2013.
See; http://nj.npri.org/nj98/04/hage.htm
and:
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/15602-federal-judge-rules-for-property-rights-smacks-down-abusive-feds
Déjà vu
The BLM and Clark County have not acted ethically or honorably in regard to this ranch and rancher. Just reduce the permit and water use incrementally until the rancher has nothing left. He can scarcely afford to fight the Goliath.
The Bundy case is not really that unique.
Post a Comment