Grazing activists are going to cheer an interactive map created by PEER (Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility).
As they sent their comments on the Greater sage grouse to the US. Fish and Wildlife Service, PEER wrote:
The comments are based on analysis of
data available for viewing on PEER’s new grazing website, which features
an interactive map combining range health data received from the U.S.
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) with high resolution satellite imagery
to enable comparison of BLM’s data with ground conditions that are
visible even to the untrained eye. The website represents the most
complete and up-to-date look at the results of BLM’s land health status
(LHS) evaluations of roughly 20,000 BLM grazing allotments across the West, results that PEER obtained through the Freedom of Information Act. [boldface ours].
The reason for the creation of the map is explained by PEER. They believed the BLM was deliberately overlooking grazing impacts, and not bringing forth data they already possessed.
In 2010, BLM launched an ambitious
regional ecological assessment program (Rapid Ecoregional Assessments
or REAs) the objective of which was to document current status and
forecast future vulnerability of resource conditions with respect to
significant disturbance factors. Livestock grazing was identified by
participating scientists in a number of ecoregions as a significant
“change agent” or cause of a wide range of ecological and environmental
impacts. BLM elected, however, to exclude livestock grazing from the
assessments, citing litigation concerns and data availability.
No comments:
Post a Comment