Tyranny of the Crown
The matter of Psychological Warfare
Perverted Laws
Two years
ago we watched with alarm and dread as the EPA case played out against the Idaho couple attempting to build their dream house on the
Priest Lake shore. Unilaterally, the EPA
determined the lot the couple had purchased was a wetland. They moved against
the couple, and, not only issued a cease and desist order, but set the penalty
for noncompliance … $37,500 per day.
Further,
they declared no judicial review of the agency’s decision would be allowed.
In the Idaho case, however, the
Supreme Court agreed to hear the argument. They sided with the couple. In a 9-0
judgment, they spanked the Washington
bureaucrats that endeavored to inflict such an action through an arbitrary
administrative edict. The justices made it abundantly clear EPA administrators
are held to the same law as the rest of us. Certainly, the federal agency
should have learned its lesson.
History now
indicates the agency simply took the bump in stride and pressed forward. In Louisiana, the names can
be changed and the land use can be altered from a home site to a landfill, but
the same tyrannical agency abuse is being carried out. In this case, relief
sought through the 5th Court of Appeals was denied. The court has
joined against citizenry by sanctioning the agency’s action.
When it comes to labeling wetlands,
the EPA remains the … judge, jury, and enforcer.
The size of the juggernaut
It is enlightening to review the
scope of the federal government.
Granted, not each of the unelected
bureaucrats running the various units are attempting to rewrite the Clean Water
Act as is their EPA counterpart, but they are bound to make sure their fiefdoms
endure.
We shall count government agencies
as they are set forth alphabetically. There are a whopping 53 commissions,
administrations, agencies, services, divisions, departments or bureaus listed
under ‘N’. There are 34 ‘A’s and 45 ‘C’s. There are 25 ‘U’s and 49 ‘F’s.
To the great relief of this
reviewer, there were no ‘X’, ‘Y’, or ‘Z’ inclusions, but there is a mega-cadre
of government entities that can write inventive regulatory demands that courts,
like the 5th or 9th Circuits, more often than not rule as
law.
A total of 471 governmental
entities have the authority to tweak, manipulate, and interpret their mandates
under their responsibility to implement law. If we don’t think there are
dangerous implications therein, Santa Claus truly exists.
These folks cannot even be fired.
We have learned in the VA scandal
that the bureaucrat wrongdoers cannot be terminated unless the process is run
through an administrative law judge. Normal citizens don’t get that same
consideration. In fact, only terrorists and prisoners get the same mandated
protections as do government bureaucrats.
There are no mandated protections
for our rights and privileges. It remains scandalous.
In fact, it is …tyrannical.
The assault in our midst
A neighbor rancher and I talked on
the phone this morning.
The rancher told me an unfamiliar
vehicle had driven into her yard this past weekend, turned around and drove off
across her pasture. She immediately followed and stopped the car asking is she
could offer some assistance. The driver indicated he was unaware the land was
privately owned.
On further inquiry, the person divulged
he was an archeologist, and he was on a mission. He was looking for rock
outcroppings where he was seeking indications of past buffalo presence. He
assured the rancher he could detect such presence by ‘rubs’ on the rocks!
If you are smiling, you must
realize this is the science of which land designation are being crafted and
policies that will be written. This will be the science of record, because we
certainly don’t have any rebuttal to offer the honorable judge in some future
court action. Our inventory of scientific buffalo rub indication is
nonexistent. In fact, we don’t even have sound science to differentiate between
Bos taurus or indicus rubs from those of mere Bison bison.
Their science will prevail and it
is being formulated in a controlled measure every day.
The neighbor rancher has a huge
stake in these findings. In fact, she is one of the ranch wives that were
featured in Range Magazine several years ago in an article entitled “Women of
the Potrillos”. In that article, those ladies discussed the matter of security
they faced every day as border ranch wives. Their safety, the safety of their
husbands, families, and all Americans was discussed with the hope the federal
government would halt any action declaring another restricted access land
designation along the border. The fact the Juarez Cartel controls the illegal
cross traffic in the large rural area where their families ranch was the issue,
but, in the end, it was for naught. The state’s senators, the progressive
wilderness supporters, and money that affords some unknown scratch specialist
to search for buffalo rubs made it happen.
President Obama signed a
presidential proclamation on May
21, 2014 making 575,000 acres of that sovereign territory a border
national monument. It couldn’t be done legislatively, but it got done. It
couldn’t be done over an eight year period with constant fear of reprisals,
endless debate, agitation and vilification, but it could be done by the stroke
of a pen.
The outcome, however, is no different
from the myriad of similar assaults on local customs and culture. It is the
same for the folks facing the wolf reintroductions, the land owners in Idaho and Louisiana,
or any number of other similar situations.
Just change the names … they are
all symptomatic of the same federal juggernaut.
Psychological warfare
Conditionally, federal actions that
affect local land use must be preceded by an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
The mention of ‘conditionally’ is
noted because the president is apparently exempt from following federal law in
using his pen to create millions of acres of national monument. In fact, it
would have been quite interesting to witness the public display if the scope of
the May 21 signing had been the entire state of New Mexico
rather than just the 575,000 acres of federal, state and private lands along
the border in Dona
Ana County
that the majority of the world could care less about.
Indeed, what is the difference in 320,
575,000 or 22 million acres in the face of a progressive agenda action without
legislation … without the true will of the people?
This matter is set forth to discuss
why an EIS is required. Many things are explicit in such a study, but,
specifically, government actions must be directed to determine how they affect
local communities as follows:
1. Changes
in public health and safety must be anticipated.
2. Community
disruption and disintegration must be guarded against.
3. Displacement
of community facilities must be determined and set forth.
4. Changes
to social interactions and family ties must be minimized and protected.
5. Impacts
on minorities and low income populations must be gauged.
6. Changes
in the ability to provide mental health services, law enforcement responses,
and changes in the community tax base must assessed and fixed.
Not a single one of these matters
was honored, prescribed, or offered in the marathon of mental anguish forced
upon the 90 families impacted by the placement of ranch investments into this
monument plan. They were not just abandoned. They were ignored and removed from
any objective attempt to minimize the impact to their lives. The senators who
engineered the plan, retired senator Jeff Bingaman, Tom Udall (D-NM), and
Martin Heinrich (D-NM) not only failed to recognize the immensity of the consequences,
they demonstrated no inclination that such mandated requirements be discussed.
It is time to describe their
actions and others the government has allowed to happen.
It
is psychological warfare aimed purposely and discriminately against Americans
who stand in the way of the environmental agenda.
Even NEPA sets forth that mental
stress is a significant factor and co-equal to physical health when evaluating
local health and safety issues. Psychological well being of individuals affect
daily functioning in all major life areas such as adaptive behavior, occupation
effectiveness and self care.
Legislatively,
the government acknowledges that certain disabilities such as PTSD are created
psychological conditions. If leaders don’t understand how this is impacting
Americans at risk, they don’t want to know. Time and again they coordinated
efforts not just to diminish the pleas offered by those affected. They reverted
to character diminishment and vilification.
Law is
being perverted. Citizens are being assaulted over inordinate, long periods of
time.
Shame on
them, and … shame on the American Congress that has lost control of its original,
constitutional purpose!
Stephen L. Wilmeth is a rancher from southern New Mexico. “I am a
victim of the psychological warfare waged against the ranchers of the Organ Mountain
Desert Peaks
National Monument. I was
wronged, but that wrong equates to the outright loss of rights and privileges
for … every single American!”
Wilmeth says the President is "apparently" exempt from NEPA. NEPA applies to "all agencies" and neither the President, the Congress or the Judiciary are defined as an agency so the law doesn't apply to them. Another instance where the elite are exempt from requirements foisted on everyone else.
Wilmeth says the President is "apparently" exempt from NEPA. NEPA applies to "all agencies" and neither the President, the Congress or the Judiciary are defined as an agency so the law doesn't apply to them. Another instance where the elite are exempt from requirements foisted on everyone else.
No comments:
Post a Comment