But that hasn’t happened.
Grazing was grandfathered in, and more than 96 percent of the monument
is still open to cattle, with 102 permittees on 82 allotments. The
ranchers wield a lot of political power, which is one reason that the
monument’s top managers don’t stick around long. (There have been six
since 1996.) The BLM is only now devising its long-overdue grazing
management plan. Even some monument staffers think that “the ranchers
and county governments are running the monument,” says Mary O’Brien of
the nonprofit Grand Canyon Trust. “The BLM is frightened and paralyzed.”
Environmental groups had hoped
for large reductions in the number of cows roaming the monument’s
fragile desert soils and riparian areas, but have managed only a few
small wins. In 1998, the Grand Canyon Trust began buying grazing permits
from willing ranchers, eventually acquiring leases on about 344,000
acres of the monument. It relinquished some of the permits to the BLM,
which closed some allotments to grazing, established some as grass
banks, and reduced cattle numbers on others. Worth Brown, then-chairman
of the Canyon County Ranchers Association, told a local newspaper in
2002, “The BLM is working with preservation groups to put us out of
business.”
However, a federal memorandum
issued that same year has made it difficult for future buyouts, by
forcing the BLM to first declare that lands within grazing districts are
no longer “chiefly valuable for grazing” before allowing a permit to be
retired.
No comments:
Post a Comment