Monday, August 08, 2016
Feds and states clash over Mexican wolf management
Catron County’s ranching community plays the unhappy wife, who never wanted to have Mexican wolves in the first place. She believes her husband, Fish and Wildlife, only loves her for her habitat, and has deliberately ignored the danger wolves pose to people, concealed information about their whereabouts, clandestinely removed evidence of wolf-killed livestock, and failed to compensate her for losses. Oh, he’s also a bleeding-heart animal lover, whose staff and volunteers “were seen crying when one of the wolves in the program had to be killed.”
The husband claims that he has bent over backwards to accommodate his wife’s extreme lupophobia. There are no documented cases of wolf attacks in the Southwest, he says, and he’s only withheld information to protect the wolves from possible abuse. As one federal leader told investigators, “Some staff might have been apprehensive about speaking with ranchers they considered ‘mean.’ ”
The report seems to lead to one conclusion: Due to irreconcilable differences, this partnership is doomed, and so is the Mexican wolf. But that’s not what contributing editor Cally Carswell finds reporting this issue’s cover story. The wolves are too closely related, and without new blood, they could eventually struggle to reproduce. Unfortunately, some of the most genetically diverse individuals have been killed because of conflicts with ranchers. Wolves raised in contained breeding facilities sometimes have trouble adapting to life in a vast landscape — especially one filled with cows.
Despite this, some progress is being made to reduce tensions...