By Robert Romano
Whatever can be done with executive action can be undone by
executive action.
That was one of the messages outgoing President Barack Obama
had for his successor, President-elect Donald Trump in an interview with NPR,
where Obama said, correctly, that “If he wants to reverse some of those rules,
that’s part of the democratic process. That’s, you know, why I tell people to
vote — because it turns out elections mean something.”
So, suddenly, upon assuming office, Trump could start
immediately rescinding controversial executive actions, whether Obama’s
executive amnesty for millions of illegal immigrants with U.S.-born children,
or his decision to close the Guantanamo Bay detention facility.
In total, Obama has issued 260 executive orders. Those could
all be rescinded on day one, as there is no legal requirement they be retained.
There’s also a bevy of regulations, including the 2009
Carbon Endangerment Finding by the Environmental Protection Agency and its
corollaries, the new and existing power plant rules, that constituted the
agency’s expansive war on coal electricity.
...Those could be rescinded by the agencies that issued them, through the process under the Administrative Procedures Act,
which could take a couple of years. Best to get started right away.
There is also the Congressional Review Act (CRA), which
gives Congress the power to roll back with simple majorities regulations within
60 legislative days of being implemented. That goes back to June, and according to the Heritage
Foundation, includes “many dozens of major rules [that] could be
vulnerable to a CRA challenge. These include, among others: Rules under the
Dodd–Frank financial regulation law, Sick leave for federal contractors,
Offshore drilling rules, and Energy mandates for home appliances.”
...Then there is Obama’s executive action to indefinitely seal off much of
the outer continental shelf in the Atlantic and Arctic Oceans from
oil and gas drilling. Obama officials are bragging that this is one action that
cannot be undone by executive action, although there is a clear process under the law for
issuing new offshore drilling leases.
But even if an attempt to undo Obama’s action to block
drilling via executive action got caught up in federal court, Congress could
always just defund it or pass new legislation repealing the provision he
invoked.
Speaking of which, Congress could always defund, or prohibit
the use of funds to implement regulations and any other executive action. So,
where all else fails — if for example litigants manage to preserve certain
regulations and other actions via federal court mandates — there is always the
budget and the power of the purse where Congress can intervene.
With that in mind, Congress could act preemptively, and
defund what it can in the April continuing resolution, particularly
controversial items the left is likely to sue over, to strengthen the
President’s hand.
Robert Romano is the senior editor of Americans for Limited
Government.
No comments:
Post a Comment