Eighteen states have sued the feds over
some new twists to the Endangered Species Act. A species no longer has
to be few in number to be listed, only its habitat has to be
"endangered." There might be trillions of some long-eared bat but if its
habitat is "threatened" as deemed by the feds, the bat could be
considered endangered. And it gets worse. According to the lawsuit, "The
final rules allow the services to declare areas occupied critical
habitat that are not occupied by the species and could not support the
species were it moved there." In other words, a species can be listed as
threatened or endangered in areas where there aren't any, and never
were. They can also be considered endangered in places where they could
not possibly survive. Under the new rules the Atlantic Ocean could be
considered endangered habitat for tigers, even though tigers can't hold
their breath underwater all that long.
Sadly, I'm not making this up. The rules
are based on the supposition that some day the land, or water, might
change and a species could theoretically live there. Think polar bears
in the Amazon Rainforest.
When I first heard about this my head
exploded but after much thought I see it presents a great opportunity to
right a wrong. Currently there is a great imbalance in the number of
endangered species each state must harbor. Hawaii has less than .2% of
America's land mass but 25% of endangered species. Four hundred live in
Hawaii while Maine only has 12. California has over 300 endangered
species while New Hampshire has nine. The Northeastern quadrant of this
country, which has the highest concentration of liberal greenies, has
the lowest number of endangered species. New York has 22, Rhode island
has 8, Connecticut and Delaware both are home to ten, and Vermont has
only five.
I'm sure easterners want to do their part
in saving species instead of just passing crazy laws, so here's my
plan. Idaho has done more than their fair share in bringing back the
wolf which is currently making endangered species out of Aberdeen Angus
and Elk. I propose trapping those killer wolves and turning them loose
in Chicago, a city that experienced a 72% increase in murders last year.
The killings would stop, at least of humans anyway, because the gang
members would be hiding in their houses, shaking in their shorts. It
doesn't matter that wolves might not be able to survive there or haven't
in the past.
Instead of giving federal aid to places
like Philadelphia let's give them endangered species. After all,
Pennsylvania only has 16 such species. We could start by giving them
some star nosed moles, dugongs, blob fish and black faced honeycreepers.
Whatever they are.
1 comment:
New Mexico would agree to send some wolves to Chicago too. Ron Emanuel could give them sanctuary, even start a petting zoo.
Post a Comment