Mateusz Perkowski
The Western roots of U.S. Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch are
encouraging to natural resource attorneys who hope his experience will
inform environmental cases affecting agriculture. As a native of
Colorado, Gorsuch has direct knowledge of the vast Western landscape and
the natural resource economy that depends on it, said William Perry
Pendley, president of the Mountain States Legal Foundation. Most of the eight justices on the nation’s
highest court hail from states without massive federal land holdings, he
said. Four are from New York, two are from California, one is from New
Jersey and one is from Georgia. “We have today a bicoastal Supreme
Court,” said Pendley. “They really don’t have an understanding of
federal land issues... They do not teach these issues at Harvard and
Yale.” If confirmed, Gorsuch is likely to review lawsuits over the
Endangered Species Act, sage grouse regulations and federal power under
the Clean Water Act, which are percolating in lower courts, said Karen
Budd-Falen, a natural resources attorney who practices in the 10th
Circuit. Gorsuch
appears skeptical about the extent of the federal government’s
authority and the obligation of the courts to defer to the executive
branch’s legal interpretations, said Jim Burling, director of litigation
for the Pacific Legal Foundation property rights nonprofit. In
one recent opinion, for example, Gorsuch wrote critically of the
ability of “executive bureaucracies to swallow huge amounts of core
judicial and legislative power and concentrate federal power in a way
that seems more than a little difficult to square with the Constitution
of the framers’ design.”...more
No comments:
Post a Comment