Wednesday, September 27, 2017

Zinke says his workers are disloyal. They say his personnel moves break the law.

As Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke blasted many within his department for being disloyal to the Trump administration’s agenda this week, the agency’s inspector general’s office continued a probe into whether officials acted inappropriately when they abruptly reassigned dozens of senior workers.
Deputy Inspector General Mary Kendall is working “to determine if the U.S. Department of the Interior followed appropriate guidelines and best practices in the reassignment of Senior Executive Service employees,” according to spokeswoman Gillian Carroll.The reassigned workers include Joel Clement, a climate scientist who was removed from his job as director of policy analysis and reassigned to a revenue accounting position for which he has no experience. The Trump administration’s goal to allow more coal mining, drilling and logging on public lands clashes with that of scientists and others at the agency who study the impact of fossil fuels and deforestation on global warming. The mission of other offices within Interior is to ensure that taxpayers get a fair share of royalties from mineral excavation and that corporations pay the cost of restoring land disrupted during mining, drilling and logging operations. “He believes . . . that the administration targeted him because he was speaking out about the danger [of climate change] to Alaska Native Communities,” said attorney Katherine Atkinson, who is representing Clement. “As a result, they labeled him as a climate guy.” Senior Executive Service members are appointed by the heads of agencies based on their job qualifications and serve at their pleasure. They can be reassigned at any time, but first certain steps must be taken, according to the rules. A sub-chapter of the code says that “a career appointee may be reassigned to any senior executive service position only if the career appointee receives written notice of the reassignment at least 15 days before the effective date of such reassignment.” The code continues: a career appointee “may not be reassigned . . . outside the career appointee’s commuting area” unless the agency consults with the worker, explains the reason for the move and engages the worker on his or her preferences for the next job...more


Actually, this is a fairly timid move, and it remains to be seen if it will stick. On his first day in office Jim Watt fired 50 attorneys, and made it stick.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

I miss ol' James sometimes...he had a set of brass danglies. soapweed

Anonymous said...

"..to determine if U.S. DOI followed appropiate guidelines & best practices in the reassignment of senior exec. service employees.." ???

Maybe Kendall should look into the guidelines followed and practiced by these Sr. exec. employees and see if they need to be reassigned to prison.

And what kind of 'guidelines' would suggest that the 'best practice' for the reassignment of a scientist who practiced inappropiate service, should be reassigned to revenue accounting, of which he has no experience...???

Or, does being 'unaccountable' qualify as experience for revenue accounting..?

Yep, questionable govt. employees who are not held unaccountable for their actions, become, instead, in charge of revenue accounting.


Anonymous said...

"The reassigned workers include Joel Clement, a climate scientist who was removed from his job as director of policy analysis and reassigned to a revenue accounting position for which he has no experience."

If Mr. Clement wants to work on climate change, he can step down and take a position as a non-SES Federal employee. The idea behind Senior Executive Service is that senior executives have generic management skills in leadership and problem solving that cut across technical fields. It follows the European model of organization where staff jobs are done by technically trained people and administrative and management jobs are done by people trained in those fields. American civil service takes a staff geologist and makes him or her a supervisor, if their performance as a supervisor is adequate, they may be promoted and can continue to do so until their competencies balance against their incompetencies--the Peter Principle.

Anonymous said...

REES: Radical Enviromental Extremists.
Their ilk permeates all gov agencies. They know "staff makes policy". Get rid of them.

dom said...

เว็บพนันบอล
ที่ได้มาตรฐานที่สุดในขณะนี้