Twenty-nine years ago this month, a Montana man had a near-fatal encounter with a grizzly bear. Although he survived by killing the bear in self-defense, his almost decadelong prosecution by the federal government reverberated through the years, making Westerners fearful of responding as he did.
Using sound science, a federal agency proposed restoring sanity to this deadly situation — but radical environmental groups sued to stop the plan. As a result, in the face of a gargantuan bear population, the lives of Westerners remain at risk.
On Sept. 9, 1989, John Shuler of Dupuyer, Mont., killed a grizzly bear he encountered while tending his sheep. The federal government brushed aside his self-defense claim, charged him with violating the Endangered Species Act, and ordered him to pay an $8,000 fine. For 8 1/2 years, federal lawyers argued he had not acted in self-defense, was at fault for exiting his home with his firearm, thus entering “the zone of imminent danger,” that, when his dog went on point on seeing the grizzly, it provoked the bear and escalated the conflict, and finally that bears are entitled to a higher standard of self-defense because they are not capable of sapient thought.
The incredible courtroom journey of Shuler was reported in too many newspapers to list, including the Wall Street Journal, was featured in two “That’s Outrageous” reports in Reader’s Digest, and was the subject of thoughtful tirades by Rush Limbaugh. Everyone had heard, if not of Shuler, then of his remarkable tale, including Pat Van Vleet of Evanston, Wyo.
In October 1998, hunting near Dubois, Wyo., and aware of Shuler’s legal nightmare, Van Vleet feared using his rifle when charged by a grizzly bear. Instead, he dropped the rifle, grabbed the can of pepper spray from his hip, and sought to defend himself. He was terribly mauled but miraculously survived.
Likewise, the Thoman family fears prosecution like that inflicted on Shuler. Their ancestors reached Wyoming in the early 1900s and have lost countless sheep to grizzly bear kills over the years, but they and their employees only carry pepper spray. In 2010, one of the family’s shepherds was charged by a fully grown female grizzly bear; it ignored the pepper spray. Fortunately, the shepherd, after being sent by helicopter air ambulance to a hospital, survived.
Help may be on the way. In 2007, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service designated grizzly bears in a 9,200-square-mile area in northwestern Wyoming, eastern Idaho, and southwestern Montana a “distinct population segment,” removed that population from the ESA list, and allowed wildlife agencies in Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming to manage them. In 2017, the agency issued a final rule concluding, among other matters, that more than 700 bears roam the area (the original goal was 500); there is only a 1 percent chance the area’s bears will go extinct in the next 100 years; the grizzly has doubled its occupied range since the 1980s; and the bears have successfully recolonized 92 percent of the region’s suitable habitat.
Still, that is not enough for radical environmental groups.
1 comment:
Better to kill the grizzly if possible and pay the fine instead of a hospital bill or your heirs paying for your funeral . Now a hunting guide was killed by a grizzly and his client badly mauled while they were dressing out an elk they had shot.
Post a Comment