Friday, May 24, 2019

Department reports wolf depredations on rise in Gila National Forest

A report released by the Arizona Game and Fish Department last Friday indicated a sharp rise in incidents of wolves killing cattle in the Gila National Forest, home to the endangered Mexican gray wolf reintroduction plan. “During the month of April, there were 37 confirmed wolf depredation incidents on livestock,” the report said. “From January 1 to April 30 this year, there have been a total of 77 confirmed and five probable wolf depredation incidents in New Mexico and 11 confirmed depredation incidents in Arizona.” These numbers show a sharp increase over past years. In the same period last year, there was a total of 29 confirmed livestock depredation incidents involving wolves and 12 confirmed wolf livestock depredation incidents in April 2018. Last year’s numbers overall marked an increase in cattle kills by wolves, something that had not been as great an issue in preceding years, despite the wolf population growing. Michael Robinson of the Center for Biological Diversity understands ranchers’ concerns but blames the depredations on U.S. Fish and Wildlife policy. He points to the wolf reintroduction in Yellowstone National Park as an example of a program that addresses some of the causes for cattle kills by endangered wolves. A major problem, he said, is that wolves will scavenge the carcasses of cows that died on their own — carcasses which are often near live cows. “If wolves are drawn to an area by attractants [i.e., dead cattle] and it becomes a problem where wolves are then killing cattle, then the wolf is still not defined as a ‘problem wolf’ — the government said ‘we are not going to penalize the wolves’ for something they do naturally,” Robinson said. The Mexican gray wolf reintroduction plan in southwest New Mexico and Arizona does not address this, according to Robinson. “The government has required nothing from livestock owners to prevent such predations. Some owners do take measures, but many do not. “Fish and Wildlife has recognized that carrion on the landscape could threaten the reintroduction,” he said. “We asked Fish and Wildlife to do something about this and they refused.” “The Center for Biological Diversity finds fault in the U.S. Fish and Wildlife’s not taking these steps, and we recognize this makes it difficult for livestock owners in the Gila,” Robinson said. An official said that wolf depredations because of cattle carcasses was an issue — but that the most of the depredations this year were not related to attractants like cow carcasses. Depredations tailed off in May. Nearly all the wolf depredations on livestock this year took place in Catron County, with a few exceptions in Greenlee and Apache counties in Arizona. It’s no coincidence that most of the Mexican gray wolves in the Gila are concentrated in sparsely populated Catron County, with only a few living outside of it. The issue that ranchers point out is that in the vast Gila National Forest on grazing allotments, not all cattle kills are found. Many just disappear and do not qualify for compensation when there is no carcass to confirm whether the loss was due to a wolf or not. Some of the suggestions from groups like the Center for Biological Diversity are already a part of the wolf reintroduction plan, but they are voluntary measures. Ranchers aren’t required to address the issue of attractants when grazing their cattle, though some do, applying recommendations like localizing cattle — actively providing hay, for example, to keep cattle in one area — or keeping cattle close to human settlements...MORE

Isn't it amazing this reporter has all this information from Robinson and CBD, but no information or quotes from a rancher or livestock organization. 

3 comments:

Paul D. Butler said...

The other amazing this is that with more wolves.......more livestock are killed. Who would have ever thought that would happen?

Anonymous said...

Within the designated wolf recovery area in AZ and NM at program inception there was only 1 place where a wolf standing still could be about 7 miles from private property. All other recovery areas were closer. The ESA requires that species recoveries only be conducted where "practicable" -a slippery art word. Nevertheless we were assured many times by the government "experts" that "five miles is a LONG way for a wolf to travel". There was really no place for wolves to exist outside of grazing/calving areas, private properties and towns. Does lying and cheating ring a bell?

As the head of the original Isle Royal wolf program, a much esteemed fellow in wolfy circles stated in the abstract to a scientific paper, "Once wolves have recovered within the recovery area, their numbers will continue to expand and eventually they will wander onto agricultural land and need to be controlled." This programs "recovery area" was plopped right on top of (at the time) nearly 100% ag designated lands.

Paul D. Butler said...

EXACTLY and thanks for the insight.............know for a fact that wolves have been seen over 500 miles from their original yellowstone location. Two possible explanations......they can and do travel more than 5 miles or remnant from previous populations that were exterminated. BTW.......you might also be interested to know that the last wolf in the Cody, WY area........before the "reintroduction"..........killed 39 yearling in one night......since the smart government guys will tell you that wolves only kill what they can eat.......that was one hungry wolf.