Gun control did not become politically acceptable until the Gun
Control Act of 1968 signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson. The
law’s primary focus was to regulate commerce in firearms by prohibiting
interstate firearms transfers except among licensed manufacturers,
dealers and importers. Today’s gun control advocates have gone much
further, calling for an outright ban of what they call assault rifles
such as the AR-15. By the way, AR stands for ArmaLite Rifle, which is
manufactured by Colt Manufacturing Co. As for being a military assault weapon, our soldiers would be laughed off the battlefield carrying AR-15s.
Let’s look at some FBI statistics on homicide and then you can decide
how many homicides would be prevented by a ban on rifles. The FBI lists
murder victims by weapon from 2014 to 2018 in their 2018 report on
Crime in the United States. It turns out that slightly over 2% (297) out
of a total of 14,123 homicides were committed with rifles. A total of
1,515 or 11% of homicides were committed by knives. Four hundred and
forty-three people were murdered with a hammer, club or some other
bludgeoning instrument. Six hundred seventy-two people were murdered by a
hand, foot or fist. Handguns accounted for the most murders — 6,603.
What these statistics point out clearly is that the so-called assault
weapons ban and mandatory buyback plan that 2020 Democratic
presidential hopeful Beto O’Rourke and others call for, will do little
or nothing to bring down homicides. More homicides could be prevented by
advocating for knife control, hammer control and feet and fist control.
Gun controllers’ belief that “easy” gun availability is our problem
ignores U.S. history. Guns were far more readily available yesteryear.
One could mail order a gun from Sears or walk into a hardware store or a
pawnshop to make a purchase. With truly easy gun availability
throughout our history, there was nowhere near the mayhem and mass
murder that we see today. Here’s my question to all those who want
restrictions placed on gun sales: Were the firearms of yesteryear better
behaved than those same firearms are today? That’s really a silly
question; guns are inanimate objects and have no capacity to act. Our
problem is a widespread decline in moral values that has nothing to do
with guns. That decline includes disrespect for those in authority,
disrespect for oneself, little accountability for anti-social behavior
and a scuttling of religious teachings that reinforce moral values.
Let’s examine some elements of this decline.
Issues of concern to people who live in the west: property rights, water rights, endangered species, livestock grazing, energy production, wilderness and western agriculture. Plus a few items on western history, western literature and the sport of rodeo... Frank DuBois served as the NM Secretary of Agriculture from 1988 to 2003. DuBois is a former legislative assistant to a U.S. Senator, a Deputy Assistant Secretary of Interior, and is the founder of the DuBois Rodeo Scholarship.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

1 comment:
The rise of narcissism, antisocialusm, the decay of tge family unit, morals.....yes yes yes
Post a Comment