Permanent
land grabs
On November 19 it became official. Both major
political parties endorse a forever expanding federal estate. Keep in mind the
feds own 29 percent of all the land in the U.S. and 90 percent of what they own
is in the Western States. In addition, the four federal land management agencies
have a total of $19.3 billion in deferred maintenance. In other words, they
can’t maintain what they already own.
So what occurred on November 19? The Senate Committee
on Energy and Natural Resources passed a bill to permanently and fully fund the
Land and Water Conservation Fund. The bill, S. 1081, is titled “Land and Water Conservation Fund
Permanent Funding Act”. The real kicker here is the language which states, “shall be made available for expenditure,
without further appropriation or fiscal year limitation.”
What does that language mean? Under current law dollars for federal land
acquisition must compete annually with other federal programs. When Trump signs
this bill into law, dollars for federal land acquisition will no longer have to
compete - they will be on automatic pilot - $900 million each year must be
spent on land acquisition.
What about programs to provide for our national defense? They must still compete, which means Republicans place a higher priority on government acquisition of private property.
What about funding research to find a cure for cancer or certain childhood diseases? They must still compete, which means Republicans place a higher priority on having less private property and more government owned and managed property than they do on the 600,000 people who die of cancer each year.
What about programs to provide for our national defense? They must still compete, which means Republicans place a higher priority on government acquisition of private property.
What about funding research to find a cure for cancer or certain childhood diseases? They must still compete, which means Republicans place a higher priority on having less private property and more government owned and managed property than they do on the 600,000 people who die of cancer each year.
Well, what about the fact the feds can't take care of the lands they
already own and which have billions of dollars of deferred maintenance? The
National Park Service alone has $12 billion in deferred maintenance which
includes "bridges, tunnels, paved parking areas, paved roadways,
buildings, housing, campgrounds, trails, waste water systems, water systems,
unpaved roads, unpaved parking areas, utility systems, dams, constructed
waterways, marinas, aviation systems, railroads, ships, monuments,
fortifications, towers, interpretive media, and amphitheaters."
What do the Republicans say about that? They have an answer: SPEND MORE MONEY!
What do the Republicans say about that? They have an answer: SPEND MORE MONEY!
The same Senate committee on the same day approved S. 500, the “Restore
Our Parks Act.” This bill would establish the “National Park Service Legacy
Restoration Fund” and fill its coffers by taking “50 percent of all energy
development revenues due and payable to the United States from oil, gas, coal,
or alternative or renewable energy development on Federal land and water that
would otherwise be credited, covered, or deposited as miscellaneous receipts
under Federal law.” This bill also contains the non-compete language.
To
summarize, Congress is taking 50 percent of the revenues from federal energy
development and permanently dedicating it to the Land and Water Conservation
Fund which is primarily used for land acquisition. Since the feds can’t take
care of what they already have, Congress is taking the other 50 percent of
energy development revenues and dedicating it to address the deferred
maintenance of the National Park Service.
Will they raise your taxes to pay for this? Yes, but in a round-about
way. These funds were deposited in the U.S treasury, and were on the income
side of the ledger. Now they will be spent on parking lots, towers,
amphitheaters, etc., and will go on the spending side of the ledger and thereby
increase our national debt. Congress must pay the interest on our national debt
each year, and that is funded by taxpayer dollars. They count on you not
noticing this round-about way of dealing with your tax dollars.
So there
you have it. Congress places a higher priority on federal land grabs and
housing for Park Service employees than they do on our national defense or
curing cancer.
Do you still think the enviros aren't calling the shots on Capitol Hill?
Do you still think the enviros aren't calling the shots on Capitol Hill?
Further, the
Department of Interior recently disbanded their Outdoor Recreation Advisory
Committee. Why? Apparently because the advisory board, which was established by
former Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke in 2017 and commonly known as the
"Made in America" committee, had recommended privatizing campgrounds
within national parks and allowing food trucks as a way to bring more money
into the system.
The enviros don't want private money to keep the backlog from growing
even larger because some recreationists might be "priced out of national
treasures." If private money is not used, then taxpayer money will be, and
that means campers visits will be subsidized by others.
This all goes back to the fact the
enviro/progressives want nothing "private" or "commercial"
to occur on or with federal lands. And that includes not only private-run
camping, but also livestock grazing, hunting, mining, oil & gas leasing,
etc. They want all things private to be excluded. That is their ultimate
goal, that is nirvana for them, and after many years of effort and many dollars
spent, they are slowly achieving their goal. The Trump administration has
proven to be a bump in the road for them, but has not provided the U-turn that
is needed.
Green New Deal
A first try to enact Green New Deal proposals into
legislation would overhaul 1 million public housing units to make them carbon
neutral. Rep. Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and presidential candidate Sen.
Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) have introduced the “Green New Deal for Public Housing
Act” that would use seven grant programs to upgrade public housing to include
organic grocery stores, onsite childcare, and community gardens. It would also
provide bicycles and high-speed internet.
This gives me the opportunity to propose the DuBois New
Deal. Instead of free bicycles and high-speed internet to each public housing
unit, my plan would provide every bunkhouse with free ropes and fast horses.
Here’s wishing everyone a Merry Christmas and a very Prosperous
New Year.
Frank
DuBois was the NM Secretary of Agriculture from 1988 to 2003, is the author of
a blog: The Westerner (www.thewesterner.blogspot.com) and is the founder of The DuBois
Rodeo Scholarship and The DuBois Western Heritage Foundation
This column originally appeared in the December issues of The New Mexico Stockman and The Livestock Market Digest.
This column originally appeared in the December issues of The New Mexico Stockman and The Livestock Market Digest.

2 comments:
Thanks for your take on this....
The most prosperous states are those with no federal land except land for post offices and military bases
Post a Comment