Sunday, March 15, 2020

GOPers Reveal Why They Voted Against the Wuhan Virus Relief Package

The House passed the Families First Coronavirus Response Act in the wee hours of the morning on Saturday after House Democrats came to an agreement with the Trump administration. The bill extends free testing for the Wuhan Virus to the uninsured. It also increases spending on unemployment benefits, Medicaid and allocates money to provide school lunches to students whose schools remain closed because of the outbreak. Although the bill passed, these 40 Republicans voted against the bill...According to Rep. Chip Roy (TX), House members were given the final version of the bill a half hour before they were supposed to vote on it. They didn't have time to read it, debate it or make any amendments. Rep. Jim Banks raised concerns about a "rushed a second short-sighted emergency bill, passed in the middle of the night and behind closed doors, that does more harm than good." "While there are some good things in the bill, we don't know the final price tag. Some language will mean major harm for small businesses and our economy," Banks said in a statement. "Moreover, it greases the skids for massive bailout packages for industries forced to implement these costly policies. Our national debt is nearing $23.5 trillion--our children's generation can't afford it." Although Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) refused to vote, he said the reason was because of the excess, non-coronavirus related things that were thrown into the bill. "Everyone is for testing. Everyone is for medical infrastructure like ventilators. Where Republicans have challenges is where we got legislative provisions that forever change entitlement programs, Gaetz told Fox News' Martha McCallum. "We should not use the coronavirus as an excuse to go and dramatically expand eligibility in the SNAP program, for example." Earlier in the day, Rep. Andy Biggs (AZ) expressed concern over the bill's language, specifically referencing the harm that small businesses would face. "We'll see how this shakes out in the last iterations, but it's going to harm some small businesses and it may put small businesses right over the edge because they're going to have to offer paid leave," he explained in a video to his constituents. "The first 14 days is going to be unpaid leave for the sickness and then the emergency unpaid leave, anything over 14 days, that business will have to pay them. And that's for every business that has at least one employee. That's where we are, the last iteration that I saw."...MORE

No comments: