Fly
over permits, grazing allotments and wildfire damage
Federal
management
Some argue for federal control of resources because of
the economies of scale. The big boys would rather deal with the feds than fifty
different states, and the enviros have always favored a centrally planned,
top-down approach, where they only have to lobby in D.C.
A recent court decision highlights a great example of
federal management of air and land resources. In a D.C. Court of Appeals
decision, we learn that Congress passed the Air Tours Management Act of 2000
which requires vendors who wish to conduct commercial air tours over certain
national parks and tribal lands to first obtain a permit from the FAA. The act
specifies that the FAA, “in cooperation with” the National Park Service, “shall
establish an air tour management plan . . . whenever a person applies for
authority to conduct a commercial air tour operation.” Congress wanted this to
be done in a timely fashion, as it instructed a decision be made “not later
than 24 months” after an application is received.
Well guess what? After twelve years not one single
management plan had been completed. Twelve years! What did Congress do? They
amended the act to make it easier by exempting smaller parks and allowing the
agencies to enter into the “more flexible and easier to implement” voluntary
agreements. The result? The agencies continued to argue among themselves and
the court found that due primarily to interagency conflict, the agencies “have
failed to comply with their statutory mandate for the past nineteen years.”
Nineteen years and they can’t get it done. What would
happen to you or I if we failed to comply with a federal statute for nineteen
years? Actually, we would have already been in jail for eighteen years and six
months.
Hammonds
& Bundy
Rancher Steve Hammond and his father Dwight, you will
recall, were pardoned by President Trump, and the Interior Dept. restored their
grazing permits. Enviros filed suit challenging the awarding of the grazing
permits, and a federal judge vacated the permits. The Hammonds then filed suit,
but recently announced they were dropping their challenge and would compete for
the allotments. Earlier this year the BLM announced they would prepare an
analysis of the qualified candidates which includes the Hammonds and three
neighboring ranches. At stake are four allotments, comprising about forty-one
square miles. A BLM spokesman said they haven’t set a specific time-frame to
reach their decision. The Hammonds, in their application, said if the permits
were awarded to another rancher they would require “immediate compensation” for
their water rights, intermingled private lands and range improvements. The
Oregon Cattlemen’s Association is “fully supportive” of the Hammond family and
would have preferred that other cattlemen not compete for the grazing
allotments, said the group’s executive director, Jerome Rosa.
Ryan Bundy is back in the news, with the BLM saying
they are investigating whether Bundy constructed illegal irrigation ditches
across land within the Gold Butte National Monument. Apparently, hikers visiting
the area have filed a four-page complaint with the BLM. Bundy told E&E news
he was unaware the BLM was looking into his irrigation activities.
Smokey
damages property
An interesting case is developing in Montana, where
two ranchers are claiming they should be compensated nearly $9 million because
the federal government burned their rangeland while attempting to control a
wildfire. In their lawsuit, the ranchers allege the U.S. Forest Service
intentionally ignited their property for “burnout and backfiring” operations
while fighting the Alice Creek fire. The
lawsuit claims, “the ranches would have suffered no material or substantial
damage as a result of the naturally ignited Alice Creek Fire,” except for the
actions of the agency. The ranchers also allege the Forest Service had “safe
and effective alternatives” to suppress the fire, but instead chose “to manage
the Alice Creek Fire with land management goals primarily in mind rather than
fire suppression.”
This case will be watched by many in the West.
Coronavirus
& Climate Change
The enviros are doing their best to use the so-called
pandemic to promote their policy goals. The most recent examples involve
climate change. At a town hall called "Saving our Planet from the Existential Threat of
Climate Change”, Washington Governor Jay Inslee said, "We should not be
intimidated by people who say you should not use this COVID crisis to peddle a
solution to climate change". Well, peddle away Governor. Of course Al Gore
has jumped into the picture, telling MSNBC, “This climate crisis and the
COVID-19 pandemic are linked in some ways…The preconditions that raise the
death rate from COVID-19, a great many of them, are accentuated, made worse by
the fossil fuel pollution.” Al Gore can out peddle Jay Inslee any day of
the week, and he has made millions of dollars doing it. You can always count on
Gore to see the dark at the end of the tunnel, and I have to wonder what his
next Uncle Sam Scam will be.
Until next
time, be a nuisance to the devil and don’t forget to check that cinch.
Frank DuBois was the NM Secretary of
Agriculture from 1988 to 2003, is the author of a blog: The Westerner (www.thewesterner.blogspot.com)
and is the founder of The DuBois Rodeo Scholarship and The DuBois Western
Heritage Foundation
This column originally appeared in the June issues of The New Mexico Stockman and The Livestock Market Digest.
This column originally appeared in the June issues of The New Mexico Stockman and The Livestock Market Digest.
1 comment:
You can see the best soccer games in fun88 login channels.fun88 login
Post a Comment