The Governor issued a statement to KRQE which begins:
"Sheriffs are not legislative or judicial bodies. Their role is law enforcement – they don’t get to decide to not do so because they don’t like it."
Yes they do. Law enforcement officers exercise discretion every day.
Coercive authority is central to the police role, and the discretionary use of police authority is a decision-making process, as officers evaluate the situations in which they intervene and choose a course of action from among a set of alternatives.
For instance, if they see a traffic violation, they decide whether or not to stop the vehicle, and whether or not to arrest, ticket or issue a warning. That type of discretion is widely used by LEO's concerning all types of laws.
There is also prosecutorial discretion.
Prosecutorial discretion is when a prosecutor has the power to decide whether or not to charge a person for a crime, and which criminal charges to file...Prosecutorial discretion also allows prosecutors not to file charges, to drop charges or to offer a plea deal.
It would appear the Sheriff's have more discretionary authority than the Governor indicates.
Although the article was concerning gun control, the Governor also chose to raise the issue of local enforcement of her lock down edicts.
"Perhaps if some sheriff’s offices spent a little less time blatantly flouting critical public health policies, they would be more able to invest their time in protecting their communities from gun violence. Although perhaps I shouldn’t hold my breath in thinking that they would want to take action to protect their communities, given that so many of them apparently have no interest in protecting the public from a deadly pandemic."Those type of spiteful, vindictive comments don't enlighten anyone and are a direct attack on duly elected local officers and the folks who voted for them.
No comments:
Post a Comment