Lessons Learned
The Numbers
Gila Defense
By Stephen L. Wilmeth
The final
blow was the graffiti that appeared on one of the outbuildings.
It appeared
overnight on one of the vacant outbuildings on the frontage road off the
interstate. The appearance of it was unlike the rest of the stuff that has
appeared over time. Most of that is probably more gang related at least that is
what folks say that should know such things. I-10 and its proximity to the
Mexican border to our south has long been an obvious feature of the cartel
operations. Any vacant structures seem to attract problems, and these have had
their day. We decided we were not going to offer a continuing temptation or a
magnet for more nefarious activity.
We fired
the Komatsu up with the intention to begin demolition.
The silver,
green, and black design of the new design, however, was quite intricate. A lot
of effort had been expended. The amount of paint used had to have been
expensive and that was mentioned to a fellow who was once a citizen liaison
with the city of Las Cruces in their program to rid the town of the same stuff.
When the mention of gangs and tagging was brought up, he suggested such
intricate work may not be gang related. It seems that there are people who have
made such artwork their avocation.
It is their hobby, an endless empty
canvas, to deface property that doesn’t belong to them.
Lessons Learned
It would
have been my grandmothers that would have been most upset with such willful
destruction of property. They were both curators of the civilized confines of
our surroundings. Refinement, to the extent it existed, came through their
influences. Formal manners were taught and enforced by them. In many ways, they
were the gate keepers into our world. Houses, their domain, were the obvious
entry points. Friends, relationships,
and the ties of family were closely tied to those homes.
It was the men that created the
physical world in which we lived. That world was ruled by outcomes and
conclusions. Feelings had little to do with anything. We were taught to suck it
up and get it done. Under the guidance and influences of that extended paternal
world, we either learned the routine, became intwined and loved it with
devotion, or eventually left it all. Honesty and work ethic were the expected
outcomes.
The combination created a hierarchy
of permanent and clear standards.
Regardless of size or grandeur, our
property was our domain and those that were not were respected and generally
left alone. Certainly, there were outlaws and ne’er-do-wells that broke those
rules, but they were exceptions and allowable customs and societal latitude
worked to fix problems without total reliance on authorities.
If somebody was stupid, they were
going to be treated as such.
There was acceptable behavior and
tolerance, and then there were points of nonreturn. There were few societal
lifelines, and there was deep and … color blind respect for individuals who
held up their end of the bargain.
That is clearly missing in the
world we now live.
The Numbers
Civility without any form of real
correction seems always to lead to chaos.
Most of us who make our living in
the country have long given up on calling the authorities on most things.
Experience with theft, for example, just doesn’t result in resolution. If we lose
something, it is gone. Unfortunately, that isn’t just a roll of wire, copper
floats, or a chain saw. In recent years, our rural community would be hard
pressed to come up with a single example of solving a cattle theft incident.
That is why calling somebody over a
matter of graffiti would be a waste of time, and we all know it.
Taken as a whole, these kinds of
incidents are so chronic they should be categorized as low-level crime. The
real crime is what has happened to our basic rights and our inability to affect
any further erosion of them.
In recent days, the matter of the
effort to designate the Gila River as wild and scenic has been front and
center. The clarion cry from the politicos and their operators has kept the
issue as one of moral and ethical commitment.
Save the River!
In one recent conservation district
meeting miles from ground zero, the attempt was made to gain regional support
for the effort by trotting out a citizen who feels so much better by just
knowing the river will be saved for future generations. It seems that fellow
occasionally visits the Gila and his soul and his inner being is recharged by
the experience. His presentation was a recapitulation of the practice of minimizing
the outcry from the local citizenry who actually face the federal assault on
their property rights.
It’s a standard practice. It’s their
standard communal practice.
The locals are characterized as if
they just don’t understand the safeguards that the purveyors and agents of the
action have taken and written into the pending legislation. They really don’t
understand the greater picture. They are incapable of seeing the future value
of the effort. Further, the basic point of arbitrage, this fellow’s recharged
soul, is elevated into a position as being on par with the rights of the locals
affected.
Bullshit!
The truth is the historical Gila
community has been taken advantage of to the point they are essentially
defenseless. They don’t have the numbers to defend themselves, and their basic
rights have been eroded to the point they can’t fight in any form of civilized
standards to defend what they have left.
In a nutshell, what they face is
the same as all outnumbered rural residents. It is a masterful manipulation of
our patience.
It is a shortcoming of failed leadership
of a system that too few have ever understood.
Stephen
L. Wilmeth is a rancher from southern New Mexico. “There are brushes, paints,
palettes, and empty canvases that don’t belong to everybody.”
****************************************
Why should we be concerned by the erosion of property rights?
From the paper Property Rights in American History by James Ely, Jr., Vanderbilt University:
First, stable property rights are a powerful inducement for the creation of wealth and prosperity, prerequisites for successful self-government. Conversely, as the English politician and author Edmund Burke declared:” A law against property is a law against industry.” John Marshall agreed that protection of property and contractual rights was crucial for economic growth. Speaking at the Virginia ratifying convention, he insisted that weak government under the Articles of Confederation “takes away the incitements to industry, by rendering property insecure and unprotected.” In short, as a leading scholar had stressed, “Marshall was convinced that strong protection for property and investment capital would promote national prosperity.” The resulting market economy would increase national wealth and benefit all citizens with increased goods.
Second, property rights have long been linked with individual liberty. “Property must be secured,” John Adams succinctly observed in 1790, “or liberty cannot exist.” An economic system grounded on respect for private ownership tends to diffuse power and to strengthen individual autonomy from government. Property was therefore traditionally seen as a safeguard of liberty because it set limits on the reach of legitimate government. By helping to preserve the economic independence of individuals, secure private property encourages participation in the political process and willingness to challenge governmental policy. Viewed in this light, the ownership of property represents personal empowerment. As one prominent historian described American society as it neared the break with England, “Men were equal in that no one of them should be dependent on the will of another, and property made this independence possible. Americans in 1776 therefore concluded that they were naturally fit for republicanism precisely because they were ‘a people of property; almost every man is a freeholder’.”
In contrast, there are few examples of free societies that do not respect the rights of property owners. One could persuasively maintain that without guarantee of property rights the enjoyment of other individual liberties, such as freedom of speech, would be meaningless. Put simply, the absence of a system of private property renders self-government unlikely. As Justice Joseph Story explained in 1829: “That government can scarcely be called free, where the rights of property are left solely dependent upon the will of a legislative body. The fundamental maximums of a free government seem to require, that the rights of personal liberty and private property should be held sacred.”
Further reading:
- The Noblest Triumph: Property and Prosperity Through the Ages by Tom Bethell (St. Martin’s Press, 1998)Draws on anthropology, economics, history, law, and philosophy to explain the central role of property to civilization.
- Property and Freedom: The Story of How through the Centuries Private Ownership Has Promoted Liberty and the Rule of Law by Richard Pipes (Knopf, 1999)Argues that property is the key factor that distinguishes free countries from unfree ones. The historical accounts are brilliantly organized and well told.
- The Guardian of Every Other Right: A Constitutional History of Property Rights by James W. Ely, Jr. (Oxford University Press, 1998)Describes how property has been treated in American law.
No comments:
Post a Comment