America’s First Family of Wilderness
FIRE!
What Mission Statement?
By Stephen L. Wilmeth
Jim Petersen, Founder, Evergreen Foundation.
America’s
First Family of Wilderness
The memory
of the fire that burned the south face of Mogollon Baldy in the ‘50s was framed
by the discussion of members of Trinity Presbyterian Church at Cliff. Sunday
night services had concluded, and everyone had stepped out front of the little
white Club House that served the congregation before a permanent home was acquired.
The flames of the fire were clearly seen.
You can
bet some of the Shelley boys are up there tonight.
Those referenced
were the descendants of Peter McKindree Shelley who had come to Grant County in
1884, 15 years before the Gila had been designated a Forest Reserve, and 21
years before the United States Forest Service even existed. Up until 1944, the
entire upper Mogollon Creek Basin including where that fire was had been
Shelley country. That changed. During the beef shortages of WWII, a power
hungry, unelected federal administrator arbitrarily ordered their grazing
permit terminated and evicted them.
It had been
the Shelley lifestyle, hospitality and their use of their vernacular, Wilderness,
referencing that range and basin country north of what even today is known as
the High Divide that had caught the fancy of a young forester who came into the
Gila in 1922. His name was Aldo Leopold, and it was he who crafted a regional
office administrative directive declaring the Gila Wilderness two years later.
Twenty
years later, the Shelley’s were evicted from everything they referred to as
wilderness. That action, which can only be described as gross abrogation of
private property rights, was done by a career bureaucrat the great majority of
the world will never know much less remember.
Two things remain
apparent.
First, his actions reek of uncontested
administrative vindictiveness. The letter of May 18, 1944, describes Shelley
lands along Mogollon Creek to the south as the rationale of his denial of
restocking the wilderness (the wilderness had been destocked to pay debts
accrued in the Depression and settling the estate of Peter Shelley). During
their request, the criticized range was stocked whereas the wilderness of
intended restocking was not. Second, his underlying intentions mirrored
conservative group think with an idea of lands untrammeled by man. Those
words were to be imagined, invented, and later inserted into the Wilderness Act
of 1964 attempting to elevate lands with wilderness characteristics into
mystical strata.
He pulled
it off, and, with it … one of the greatest American family tragedies of the 20th
Century West.
What
Mission Statement?
Try to find
the original Mission Statement of the United States Forest Service these days
and you’ll be confounded.
From the congressional
directive in 1905, though, its charge was simple. Federal land reservation was
for watershed protection and timber production. Shortly thereafter, though, Gifford
Pinchot took over the reins and soon declared he could manage forests as well
as the European elite and fires would be eliminated. The stockpiling of
kindling began.
Fast
forward to the present and the restatement of the current Mission Statement of
the agency reads like a nursery rhyme:
To
sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the nation’s forests and
grasslands to meet the needs of present and future generations. For more than
100 years, the Forest Service has brought people and communities to answer the
call of conservation.
The suggestion of assuring an enduring and
bountiful water resource or maintaining a timber base for the nation is long
gone. It isn’t there because in 1985 (and other hallmark years), the agency
started adopting rapidly evolving policies that included the expansion of
allied forces that, if they couldn’t actually spell untrammeled, liked the
sound of it whispered over wine and hors-d’oevres.
City
stupidity and its affiliated custodial duties fully replaced the customs and
culture of sustainability endeavors. Timber production went the way of livestock,
and both migrated in mass to private lands of the Southeast. Mining was
squeezed to the point of strangulation and the fires only burned bigger. They
burned, not because of global warming, but because those Western depositories
of kindling have been stacked with fuel to the point spontaneous combustion has
replaced all semblance of adult supervision in the federal forests and
grasslands.
FIRE!
I
remember dad packing for it (the fire on Mogollon Baldy hereinabove). He
was packing six mules by himself. The forest service had a camp where the road
crossed (Mogollon) creek. He would get there before daylight and load mules and
(ride) to Bud’s hole then over and up West Fork and come out on Lookout Ridge
to the fire camp (on the fire). Unload the mules and down Lookout Ridge to Bud’s
Hole then on to the house and it would get dark on him coming off Lookout Ridge.
Back to the house and the same thing the next day. They had 300 men on the
fire. They would eat everything he would bring. He did that for 14 days and
they finally got him some help with some more mules.
Terrell Shelley, Owner and Patriarch of the 137-year-old
916 Ranch
The fire of seven decades ago was but a sliver
of the fire that is now burning on the mountain and the surrounding Gila
drainages. The current fire, the Johnson Fire, is burning at a gain rate of
about 7,000 acres a day. It’s obviously big. It represents almost 16% of the
nearly 600,000 acres of the largest and most dangerous fires across the West. At
this point, there is no hope for control until the monsoons arrive. There are
implications galore, but, like the fire of 1953, there are Shelley boys up
there. In the extreme heat while they still can, Terrell’s son Jerrell has been
gathering their cattle up to the High Divide. Asked what he sees of the fire’s
character, Jerrell said:
Where the cows graze the fire
just creeps along burning all the deadfall. Where the grass is tall (ungrazed)
in the brush, the fire (is) so hot it incinerated everything completely
to the ground. Not even a stump left standing … moonscape.
So, much for left untrammeled by
man, eh?
The truth is the severity of the
Johnson Fire is direct result of Forest Service management. Suppressing fires and
doing everything in their power for too many years to limit any fuel removal in
a plant community that evolved in a periodic fire regime is far from being
untouched by man. It is an artificial, contrived attempt to impose an
unsustainable manmade concept on a landscape that will eventually correct
itself.
At best, pristine is a temporal
condition.
The truth is the entire footprint
of the original Shelley allotments would be infinitely better off today if
cattle had been allowed to remain. Just like any skill, craft, or industry the business
of livestock has evolved. Better practices, the installation of infrastructure,
and improved knowledge have led to many things that have changed and improved
dramatically.
With and through its all-powerful
agencies, our government has invested too heavily in concepts that must become
contrary to constitutional, citizen sovereignty. It becomes a matter of their
survival, but it’s a plan that simply doesn’t work.
In this case, fire and litigation are the only two growth components. It joins the ultimate American tragedies with...far too many chapters and verses.
Stephen L Wilmeth is a rancher from southern New Mexico. "What took place by agency politics and bureaucracy of these public lands is the roadmap to the end of the American model."
1 comment:
In places I work the Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management have been using what they call "riparian areas" as the basis for stocking entire (large) allotments. Managing for what they claim is riparian health means there will always be crystal clear water, abundant streambank vegetation, and of course abundant fish and wildlife. Riparian standards can only be met by eliminating most of the upland grazing first according to our government wisdom and they do that with a lot of enthusiasm because the benefits they imagine are always worth far more than the costs to local citizens and economies.
When the hillsides burn off, courtesy of regulations prohibiting grazing that built up masses of fuels, the first time it rains or the first snow melt brings all that ash and loose soils into the creeks that are the source of their riparian areas. Most animals and all aquatic species die as a result of fires caused by mismanagement and their solution will always be prohibiting grazing for even more years.
Post a Comment