Managing the Resource
The Administrative State
Yapping Chihuahuas
The Administrative state is that
branch of the national government that has the most effect on your daily life
and has become out of control, unmoored to any system of democracy.
~ John Yoo
The drought
drones onward.
Amidst the
daily duties of managing what we are brainwashed to reference as global
warming, the horizons have been reduced. In fact, on Tuesday, the visibility on
the north end of the ranch was limited to under a mile. You couldn’t even see
Jim and Faye’s house off the slope in the Uvas Valley from the Matamora well.
As the day
wound onward the reliable southwest flow of wind reappeared and aggressively
manhandled the cancer-causing particulates and greenhouse gases within the
shroud of smoke, and drove them northeastward. What was revealed was that there
still are islands of mountain ranges in southern New Mexico.
In order of
appearance, the Goodsights, The Cooke’s range, the Las Uvas, the Caballos, the
Frau Cristobals, and, finally, the Black Range reemerged from hiding. It was
the latter that revealed the source of the federal gaseous soup. The Black Fire
was belching a fountain of smoke 35,000’ into the wild brown and yellow cast
wonder.
Yessiree, the United States Forest
Service was up there managing the resource in its annual pent-up cataclysm
of conflagration of up to 9,000,000 acres of (perhaps) once iconic American forest
lands. In the immediate process, they were contributing to the even grander desequestration
of carbon being stoked and released into northern New Mexico skies.
When these various smoke plumes
join to spread on across the heartland and the nation, their collective pall
makes a cow fart look like an electron arrayed against … the planet of Jupiter.
The Administrative State
The collection of the various
federal agencies is no longer a national posse of cohorts, but, rather, a
legion of nonelected jefes and dictators.
They are the constitutionally
silent, fourth branch of government, and many should say they are also its most
powerful component. For example, every environmental rule is not a
congressional dictate. The height of an allotment boundary fence is not a
congressional parameter. The Wilderness Act says that grazing shall continue
where it was in place at the time of the signing of the bill in 1964, but over
80% of those same legal allotments are now gone. Congress hasn’t enacted an all-comers
welcome party at the border, nor does it set miles per gallon requirements for
new cars. Congress didn’t demand mask coverage over the past two years. It doesn’t
dictate what color to paint your storage tanks, and it doesn’t oversee the requirement
to hold in check the executive branch to create millions of acres of protected
land designations in the Antiquities Act out of its phrasing of the smallest
area compatible with the proper care and management of the object.
The fact is the most impactful
regulatory demands on our daily lives don’t come from Congress nor do they get
approved by those characters that represent themselves to be game changers when
they get elected to serve. It is endless, though, and the bottom line is that
ordinary people have no representation against the most critical burdens of
their daily lives.
The Administrative State rules
supreme.
From the standpoint of budgets for
agencies, they are funded by annual appropriations as discretionary funding
which constitutes about one third of all the monies spent annually by
Washington. Try to find actual reductions of agency funding, however.
Discretionary funding is largely a hokum reference to what constitutes another bottomless
swamp of mandatory funding. Abject mismanagement is even rewarded.
The sickening air of this week’s
western air quality is witness to that fact.
Yapping Chihuahuas
Today, Paul texted from his front
row seat observing the various extras from the bar scene in Star Wars (Chicago)
that he’d really like to leave that urban nightmare, close the front gate, and
reside simply at the ranch.
For some reason his text reminded
me of what Tim recently said about pretty boys that can rope, but spend way too
much time riding along watching their shadows and constantly delegating the
hard work to anybody but themselves. He described these prima-donnas as yapping
Chihuahuas always barking and drawing attention to themselves, but always
finding a way out of the heat when the fangs appear.
If his cow pasture theorem is true,
it can be deducted the Congress, too, could well be dominated by a collection
of yapping Chihuahuas. The suggestion comes from a principle in administrative
law that Congress cannot delegate its legislative powers to other entities. The
term of reference is the nondelegation doctrine. This prohibition
involves Congress unconstitutionally delegating its legislative powers away to
administrative agencies, or, worse yet, to private organizations, NGOs.
John Yoo, he of aforementioned
quote, says the Supreme Court should have stepped in long ago and slapped some
sense into this collection of office holders who have traded away their primary
duties. They ride along, watch their shadows as they stride to the dais, and
constantly delegate away their sworn allegiance to uphold the Constitution of
these United States. Little do they know or care that the big end of the ruling
megalith they think they oversee is now operating beyond the bounds of
constraint and control.
It is an understatement to say this
country is in a mess. Name an area or observe a list of highest citizen
concerns and the realization abounds that failure is the likelihood. Couple
that with a chief executive that rules through the oracle of the teleprompter
and there becomes little expectation this system has the ability to correct
itself.
From a regional perspective, the
effects are erasing the character of local communities. The impact of
Washington is everywhere. Nobody is in charge, everybody is in charge, and the
administrative state only gets more authoritarian.
Stephen
L. Wilmeth is a rancher from southern New Mexico. “God bless Texas this morning.”
The post-New Deal administrative state is unconstitutional, and its validation by the legal system amounts to nothing less than a bloodless constitutional revolution. The original New Dealers were aware, at least to some degree, that their vision of the national government's proper role and structure could not be squared with the written Constitution: The Administrative Process, James Landis's classic exposition of the New Deal model of administration, fairly drips with contempt for the idea of a limited national government subject to a formal, tripartite separation of powers. Faced with a choice between the administrative state and the Constitution, the architects of our modern government chose the administrative state, and their choice has stuck.[1] ” —Gary Lawson, Harvard Law Review, April 1994
The administrative state represents a new and pervasive form of rule, and a perversion of constitutional self-government. It has deep theoretical roots that were overlooked for a long time, roots inimical to the Constitution, thereby providing a lesson in the importance of understanding the principles of the Constitution. A chief feature of the administrative state is its relentless centralization, but with a reciprocal effect: its mandates, regulations, distorting funding mechanisms, and elitist professionalism have corrupted our political culture all the way back down to local government. It is the chief reason why Americans increasingly have contempt for government.[1]
2 comments:
Steven Wilmeth is an amazing orator and this post should be required reading for every US citizen.
Well if it’s so bad here then move to another country.
Post a Comment