Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Waxman-Markey Climate Bill's Emissions "Cap" May Let U.S. Emissions Continue to Rise Through 2030

If fully utilized, the emissions "offset" provisions in the American Clean Energy and Security Act would allow continued business as usual growth in U.S. greenhouse gas emissions until 2030, leading one to wonder: where's the cap in the "cap" and trade? At the heart of the nearly thousand page long climate change and clean energy bill being debated in the U.S. House of Representatives this week is a "cap and trade" mechanism aimed at limiting greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to global warming. However, a provision in the bill, known as the American Clean Energy and Security Act (H.R. 2454 or "ACES"), allows polluting firms in the U.S. to finance emissions reductions overseas in lieu of reducing their own global warming pollution and may allow American emissions to continue to rise for up to twenty years, according to new analysis from the Breakthrough Institute. The provision allows power plants, oil refiners, and other polluters regulated under the bill's cap and trade program to use up to one billion tons of international emissions reductions, or "offsets," to be used instead of reducing their own emissions each year. The bill also allows up to one billion tons of additional offsets each year, sourced from sectors of the U.S. economy that do not fall under the pollution cap, such as forestry and agriculture. If a suitable supply of domestic emissions offsets are unavailable, the limit on the use of international offsets may be raised to 1.5 billion tons annually at the discretion of the Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The extensive use of these international and domestic offsets would effectively allow U.S. firms in capped sectors to continue emitting global warming pollution at levels well above the reductions supposedly driven by the emissions cap. New analysis from the Breakthrough Institute reveals that if fully utilized, the offset provisions in the ACES bill would allow continued business as usual growth in U.S. greenhouse gas emissions until 2030...Breakthrough Institute

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Reference: Carbon.
Sirs: I do not understand what is being done that carbon is so bad. I am made of carbon, I eat food that has carbon, My medicine is made with carbon. My home has wood that has carbon. I exhale carbon!! All bio-fuels have carbon, whether alcohols, bio-diesel, trees. Oil and coal have carbon. When you burn any of the above you produce Carbon Dioxide. The earth has the same amount of carbon from the begining of time as now exists. Carbon has been recycled by Mother Nature since the begining of time. About the only fuel that does not have carbon is hydrogen and lots of luck geting that on line. (like where are you going to get the energy to disassociate the hydrogen from water if that is what you use.) I think real science is being left out.

Anonymous said...

"In addition to contributing to the formation of smog, in which respiratory problems can occur, carbon monoxide can also affect the central nervous system and those with cardiovascular disease."

http://www.enviroliteracy.org/article.php/353.html

Perhaps you don't understand that carbon comes in different forms, and that we extract it, produce it and inhale it through various means. Hydrogen is a part of water, which we need to live, but I wouldn't recommend drinking it in it's other forms (like hydrogen peroxide) :)