The Cibola
Controversy
On June 11, 2013, Mountainair District Forest Ranger Karen
Lessard issued an order to all 19 allotment owners (including the DuBois
allotment) saying that “due to severe drought conditions…I have decided to
suspend all grazing on the Mountainair Ranger District.” The order said livestock grazing would be
suspended “for a period of not less than one year” and that “Return to grazing
will be graduated.”
In response, your NM livestock organizations wrote a letter to
the Regional Forester expressing concerns over the order. They wrote:
This appears to affect
every permittee in the district without taking into consideration the various
conditions over a large area and specific to each allotment. A blanket order of this type is unacceptable
unless backed up by monitoring data for each allotment. Good range management does not come from
following the Drought Monitor…Given the nature of precipitation events in the
southwest, being highly variable with respect to intensity, duration and scope,
it is highly unlikely that all allotments were equally affected. An “across the board” livestock removal
appears to be an arbitrary and capricious decision.
The Mountainair district
would fit in a box that is approximately 64 miles wide from east to west and 62
miles long from north to south. It is
ludicrous to think the intensity, duration and scope of rainfall would be the
same across this vast expanse.
Congressman Steve Pearce also wrote to the Forest Service to
express his “disappointment and disagreement” with the order. In addition, he encouraged the Forest Service
to “activate an existing Memorandum of Agreement and utilize Section 8 of the
Public Rangelands Improvement Act to bring together the the permittees, the
Forest Service and experts at New Mexico State University to seek an equitable
solution.”
As expected, the new Regional Forester, Cal Joyner, wrote
back defending the district’s actions.
However, he did state “the collection of site-specific quantitative data
on each allotment is impossible given limited resources” and pledged the Forest
Service would “welcome the engagement and assistance” of the New Mexico
Department of Agriculture (NMDA) and the Range Improvement Task Force (RITF) in
the “assessment of forage resource conditions on the affected allotments.”
On September 25th reps from NMDA and RITF had
their initial meeting with Allen Warren, the Range Management Specialist for
the Mountainair district. And sure
enough, the first thing Mr. Warren did was hold up the drought map and say
“have you guys seen this”? So much for
“site-specific” range analysis.
The reaction in the countryside to the livestock removal order
was swift. The Lincoln County Commission
passed a resolution stating it was an “arbitrary, non-scientific, blanket
removal order which did not take into consideration differences in resource
conditions on the various allotments” and expressing concern over the negative
consequence to the ranch families and the local community. During the hearing on the resolution
Commissioner Jackie Powell told Ranger Lessard, “You're wrong, and it's not right to do the people of New
Mexico like this, especially those here since the 1920s trying to make it. They
need to be worked with."
The
Torrance County Commission unanimously passed the same resolution, with Commission Chair LeRoy
Candelaria saying, "I support these people." During that hearing rancher Matthew Aragon
said he was planning on moving cattle on the Jesus Baca ranch from the Monte
Largo allotment to the rested Comanche allotment when the order was
issued. "The ability to graze was unfortunately pulled from us
at a time it was desperately needed," he said. Aragon said Allen
Warren visited the Comanche allotment and "looked at maybe 100 acres of the 20,000 acres. Even
though the land had not been grazed for three years, he still felt he needed to
remove us."
The East
Torrance Soil & Water Conservation District (SWCD) and the Edgewood SWCD also
passed the resolution. Writing to the
Forest Service on behalf of the Claunch-Pinto SWCD, Chairman Felipe Lovato, Jr.
questioned whether the removal of all livestock “will result in the most
rapid recovery of forage conditions.”
Lovato, Jr. also wrote, “One of the factors that argues against issuing
a blanket order like the one in question is the inconsistent nature of rainfall
in our region. We all know that
precipitation in our District is often so localized that both the total amount
and the manner in which it is delivered can vary significantly from one pasture
to the next.”
Meeting On Bryan
Allotment
The first Section 8 meeting was held on November 4 at the
Antelope Allotment. Present were the
allotment owner, Forest Service personnel and reps from NMDA and the RITF. Also attending was Lincoln County
Commissioner Preston Stone. Commissioner
Stone says they all met at a designated spot, but that Ranger Lessard never
left her vehicle for the thirty minutes or so they were there. The group then moved to a “monitoring
spot”. Stone says he asked Allen Warren
if the Forest Service had done a range analysis on this allotment. Warren replied “no.” Stone then asked if they had performed a
range analysis on any of the allotments.
Again the response was no.
It was at this point that, according to Commissioner Stone, Ranger
Lessard got out of her vehicle and approached the group. Stone says the first words out of her mouth
were “I’m pissed off” and that she had been “set up”. Stone says RITF’s Dr. Sam Smallidge “addressed the fact that the
Ranger District had prior notification of the meeting, and that no
under-handed doings went on whatsoever.”
Stone continues, “I challenged Ranger Lessard about her ‘pissed
off attitude’, being that the allotment owners were the ones financially
devastated by a decision she had made with no scientific data to back up a
blanket removal of livestock.”
Livestock Return
After
several more Sec. 8 meetings and the collection of data, on December 2nd
livestock were allowed back on the forest.
Allotment owners received a letter from the Ranger Lessard saying
the
Cibola National Forest “authorizes you to stock your full permitted number and
types of livestock on your allotment.” In
January the allotment owners received their annual operating instruction for
this year’s grazing season and a set of draft monitoring protocols.
In
the January letter I counted the word “drought” six times and the drought map
was referred to again. Will they be
using the map or monitoring data for their decisions? Time will tell.
Further,
the January letter has the audacity to state, “The severity of this drought has
prompted a cooperative monitoring effort” with the RITF. No, the cooperative monitoring effort was
begun because the allotment owners and Congressman Pearce requested it and the
Regional Forester approved it.
Misinformation Spread
During
the meeting on the Bryan allotment, the Forest Service’s Allen Warren told an
allotment owner the Memorandum of Agreement on Sec. 8 of PRIA was “old” and “no
longer in effect.” I was sure this was
inaccurate and a quick phone call to the Regional Office verified the MOA was
still in effect.
I’m
intimately familiar with this issue, as I helped write the legislation while on
Senator Domenici’s staff, and then later negotiated the MOA with the Forest Service. It’s an excellent tool that can be initiated
by the Forest Service or the allotment owner.
It provides for bringing in a third party whenever there is a potential
disagreement. If the Forest Service had
utilized this approach in the Mountainair district I probably wouldn’t be
writing this column.
The
larger question is why did Warren say this?
It certainly doesn’t jive with Regional Forester Joyner’s letter stating
they would “welcome the engagement and assistance” of NMDA and the RITF.
At a recent annual meeting conducted by Warren with an
allotment owner and his family, the discussion turned to livestock grazing and
other uses of the forest. Mr. Warren
told them “you people need to understand that grazing is not a priority,
recreation and hunting is the priority.”
I guess that explains a lot, although I don’t believe that is official
Forest Service policy nor is it compliant with federal law.
Call For An Investigation
Lincoln
County Commissioner Stone is appalled at what he has witnessed during this
entire process. “I've never worked with
a government agency where the employees had such an arrogant attitude as
this bunch.” Stone says, “I feel the
Mountainair Ranger District, without any second thoughts, should be
investigated after seeing how Ranger Lessard and Alan Warren treated the
allotment owners.”
The
other Commissioners agreed, as they unanimously voted on December 17 to direct
their County Attorney “to move forward filing a request for a Congressional
investigation of the Mountainair Ranger District.” On Jan. 22, the attorney for Lincoln County
filed the request for an investigation.
This
whole thing has been an embarrassment to the Forest Service and has caused
economic harm to the allotment owners, their families and their local
communities.
Till
next time, be a nuisance to the devil and don’t forget to check that cinch.
Frank DuBois was the
NM Secretary of Agriculture from 1988 to 2003, is the author of a blog: The
Westerner (www.thewesterner.blogspot.com) and is the founder of The DuBois Rodeo
Scholarship (http://www.nmsu.edu/~duboisrodeo/).
This column originally appeared in the February issue of the New Mexico Stockman.
2 comments:
Calling for an investigation might cause the Forest Service people to behave differently.
Does the County involvement include possible civil or criminal actions against the FS employees? The article indicates due process violations that someone should be held accountable for.
These two people hurt a lot of the allotment owners and ruining some of there lifes. They took there job away, and there way of living. I wonder how would they like it if someone just said one day I am taking your life away, how would they like it. Ranchers, especially ones that have been ranching for awhile know how to manage there land.
Post a Comment