This
month we look at Congressional cowardice and chicanery
Shame
on Congress
Congress recently passed the 2,000-page Omnibus
spending bill and many had hoped that with a new Speaker in the House this
legislation would start bringing spending under control and place road blocks
to the Obama Administration’s most outrageous environmental power grabs.
Recent appropriations bills had included policy riders
that would:
° Prevent the listing of the sage
grouse under the Endangered Species Act,
° Require the de-listing of wolves
in Wyoming and the Great Lakes from the endangered species list
° Prevent the implementation of
Secretarial Order 3310, issued on December 22, 2010 (Wildlands policy)
° Require a
government-wide report on expenditures for global warming, and
° prevent
the enforcement of the waters of the United States (WOTUS) rule
And in this bill? Nada. Zero. Zilch. (sage grouse was there)
It’s a complete cave-in to the Obama environmental
agenda.
Some are even suggesting we start referring to the
current leadership as The Cavemen.
Perhaps they had at least addressed the spending
issue.
Not hardly.
The bill increases overall spending, including
increases for the BLM, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and Park Service.
And, oh yes, the bill will DOUBLE the spending for
federal land acquisition.
Expressing the frustrations of many New Mexicans,
Steve Wilmeth recently wrote in The Westerner, “The funding for sanctuary
cities, resettlement of refugees, funding the Endangered Species Act and
Planned Parenthood, acceptance of the WOTUS rule, sanctioning the Red River
land grab, purchasing more private property in the West, expanding most agency
budgets, and extending the tax credits for terminally deficient green energy
dreams were all supported.” Resulting,
says Wilmeth, in the Obama agenda being “fully sanctioned by congressional vote.”
There have been similar reactions by the national
media. Laura Ingraham calls the bill
the “omni-bust”, Mark Levin proclaims the Ryan Speakership “already a disaster”
and Rush Limbaugh saying despite Republicans controlling “the largest
number of seats in the House they’ve had in Congress since the Civil War,” on
this bill they’ve sold the country “down the river.”
Presidential candidates have also taken note,
with Ted Cruz saying this “big-government” bill demonstrates, “that we have a government of the lobbyist,
by the lobbyists, and for the lobbyist” and Donald Trump proclaiming, “Congress threw in the towel and showed
absolutely no budget discipline.”
What a shame.
All four members of the New Mexico Congressional
Delegation supported the Omnibus spending bill.
Vilsack
threatens Congress & The West
The Forest Service has proposed a new way to fund
fighting wildfires, treating them like other natural disasters. This would replace the current system where
if the costs of fire-fighting exceed current appropriations the Forest Service
borrows from other programs to cover the costs.
And now Vilsack is livid that Congress didn’t include
the proposal in the Omnibus spending bill.
Vilsack has written what can only be described as a threatening letter
to Congress declaring who will no longer initiate interdepartmental transfers
to cover the costs of fighting forest fires.
“If the amount Congress appropriated in 2016 is not
sufficient to cover fire suppression costs, Congress will need to appropriate
additional funding on an emergency basis,” Vilsack wrote.
Give me more money or I’ll let the West burn.
Vilsack needs to explain, however, why it costs the
Forest Service so much more to fight fires than the Interior Dept. In terms of Firefighting Costs Per Acre, in
2014 the Forest Service costs were $1,317 while the costs for the Interior
Dept. were $264 per acre. Why the huge
difference in costs, with the Forest Service charging five times as much as
Interior?
And in case some may think different, Interior’s role
is not insignificant. The Forest Service and Secretary
Vilsack are constantly pointing to the near-record number of acres burned in
2015, approximately 9.8 million. Problem
is, less than 20 percent of those acres were on national forest lands, while 54
percent were on Interior lands.
No wonder
Congress didn’t rubber stamp the proposal.
And that,
folks, is all I can stand to write about this month.
Till next
time, be a nuisance to the devil and always check that cinch.
This column originally appeared in the New Mexico Stockman and the Livestock Market Digest.
No comments:
Post a Comment