An Election Looms
Promoting Rural Prosperity in America
Views of “Conservation”
By Stephen L. Wilmeth
If you
haven’t experienced New Mexico
spring winds, plan a trip down here next year.
For the
past two days, afternoon winds have howled, everything is dusty, and the grit
in your teeth mixes well only with tooth paste. Yesterday was a day to spray
African Rue. BJ and I were at our Howard pens trying to spray the nasty stuff
before the wind kicked up. By noon,
it was too strong to continue. We packed up and headed off to other duties.
When I left the ranch, cows were lying down and little heads of baby calves
peaking out above the grass dotted the landscape. The wisdom of a cow never
ceases to amaze me. She’ll take what she gets and never complains. She’ll find
a protected place and ride the big blows out chewing her cud in contentment.
All of us
would do well by mimicking her patience.
Views of “Conservation”
Not a land steward in our area had any
responsibility for the arrival of African Rue. Supposedly, it came in on
military aircraft returning from North Africa
during the war first gaining a foothold at the old military airfield at Deming.
Now, it is expanding everywhere and we are worried that 2017 is a watershed
year in the control of the stinking, succulent plant. If we can’t get a
reasonable control this year, future control is going to be tough.
So, we
spray.
Our
abundant winter moisture kick started its growth and the plant is probably a month
ahead of normal. The clock we face is to get chemical on the plant while it is
still tender and growing. As soon as it starts drying back with summer heat, it
does no good to spray. Our current program is very important.
I have
grown to hate the smell of the plant and the material we use, but we are the
only line of defense. Although the plant takes over disturbed areas regardless
of land ownership, we spray. We spray on federal land, we spray on state trust
land, and we spray on our private lands. Since there is more federal land than
any other ownership, there is more of the weed on those lands.
The credit
for acquiring the material to spray comes from local conservation districts,
key BLM employees, and the land stewards involved. The Deming Soil and Water
Conservation District has been very aggressive in tackling the problem, and it
is their example that other local conservation districts, including Dona Ana
Soil and Water Conservation District, are trying to emulate.
It was,
therefore, eye blinking to read last week that the local progressive junta declared
the Dona Ana board was a board without conservation minded members.
An Election Looms
Of course,
the editorial setting forth the accusation was part of the progressive effort
to place two of its chosen members on the board which holds elections this
coming Tuesday. The fact that those candidates have no experience in the Soil
and Water Conservation Act setting forth the duties and responsibilities of
board members doesn’t matter. The fact that the law requires the protection of
the local tax base by instituting programs that support agriculture doesn’t
matter, either. Like all progressive politics, the real goal is to displace local
influences and replace them with a brand of conservation that elevates sights
and sounds over generational ties and promotes central planning over the toil
of the caretakers who have made this area an agricultural universe distinct
from the rest of the state.
Poll 1000
visitors and I’ll wager the gist of their impressions would run in parallel
responses. The proximity of the urban settings against a backdrop of farms
would be a dominate feature. The impact of Dona Ana grown chile would be
forever embedded into their senses. The stark contrast of the desert against
the green valley and its pecan orchards and water distribution systems would
invariably be elevated. The Organs, looming on the horizon, especially with
their westward exposure and light playing off them as the day extends, would be
locked in memory.
Those
things would be the common impressions. There is nothing in them that would
suggest partisan politics, environmental elitism, or urban, secular no growth policies
are warranted. Those things don’t add to the charm and the ambiance of the Mesilla Valley. On the contrary, they pose
outright challenges to its continuation.
The
greatest risk to the sensory impressions relates to the blind policies that
march toward the inevitable loss of the irrigated farmland base. We must
remember that 87% the ownership of Dona
Ana County
is government in one form or the other. Nearly nine of every ten acres is
controlled by government. The loss of viable farmland because of the necessity
to grow into the valley has had profound impact on the agriculture community.
Residential growth long ago should have been directed to the mesquite and
creosote mesa tops to the west rather than the valley or the slopes to the
Organs. Federal ownership disallowed it.
Alternatives
were necessitated.
Minimum
acre lot sizes and subdivisions have isolated water distribution systems, left
parcels without dedicated well service, and made scattered acreage unprofitable
to farm. Values have driven the acceleration of toward alternative land use
planning, and, with that, the diminishment of opportunities for young steward
recruitment. This county has a 17% young farm manager recruitment rate. The
barriers to entry are huge and the reality of the continuation of the small
farm/urban mix is tentative at best. It can’t go on.
The
expansion and the locks on government lands in this county have devastating impacts
on the generational foundations of this community. It is forcing growth onto
flood plains and irreplaceable farmland with all the dangers and the cost that
are consequential when development must take place under reclamation dams that
were not designed to protect homes and human safety. Esoterical debates on the definition
of conservation notwithstanding, progressive politics has had profound and
devastating effects on the very things that make this area so unique and
appealing.
Managing water and soil resources
from ivory towers is ludicrous.
Promoting Rural Prosperity in America
It is in the national interest to promote American agriculture and
protect the rural communities where food, fiber, forestry, and many of our
renewable fuels are cultivated.
Those are
not my words although I fully agree with them. Those are words from the
president’s Executive Order, “Promoting Agriculture and Rural Prosperity in America”,
signed April 25. The purpose and function of the order is various, but several
key points are at issue. One is to remove barriers to economic prosperity
and quality of life in rural America.
Next would be implementing rural economic
development with programs tailored to relevant regional
circumstances. And, finally, the idea of
respecting the unique circumstances of small businesses that
constitute the foundation of our rural community is so welcome that it gives pause to
those of us who have to spray African Rue because we know we are the only line
of defense.
Beware of
the banners of progressive politics. Those folks don’t understand your world
nor do they care. In the case of Dona
Ana County
conservation board, you need to vote for the candidates that actually
understand the requirement to protect and expand the tax base. How do you
recognize them?
They will be the candidates with the rough hands.
Stephen L. Wilmeth is a rancher from southern New Mexico. “The sight
of pairs lying in tall grass in a big wind storm is comforting and fulfilling.
When you have a hand in their creation and wellbeing, you understand the full
implications.”
No comments:
Post a Comment