A mistrial, a Heinrich
maneuver, and a monument misstep
Bundy Mistrial
Chief United States District Judge for Nevada, Gloria Maria
Navarro, has declared a mistrial in the charges against the Bundy family and
one accomplice. What started as a simple case of failure to pay grazing fees
has, thanks to the disturbing actions by the feds, turned into a national
showcase of federal abuse of power.
Chief Judge Navarro found that in six different instances
the federal prosecutor had failed to turn over exculpatory evidence to the
defense, which is required under the so-called Brady rule. How much was not
turned over? Oh, just 3,300 pages.
Initially, prosecutors said there was no surveillance of the
Bundy family prior to the raid on their cattle. They lied. Then prosecutors
said the cameras just provided a live feed.
They lied about that too. The prosecutors originally claimed there were
no federal snipers. Again, they were found to be lying.
The prosecutors fought to keep the Bundys in jail because
they were a threat to society. Some of the documents they failed to disclose
were FBI threat assessments of the Bundy’s which found just the opposite.
Imagine being kept in federal confinement for two years under false pretenses.
And just prior to Judge Navarro declaring a mistrial, a
bombshell memo from a BLM law enforcement officer to the Dept. of Justice was
made public. In the memo, BLM Special Agent Larry C. Wooten stated, “I
routinely observed, and the investigation revealed a widespread pattern of bad
judgement, lack of discipline, incredible bias, unprofessionalism and
misconduct, as well as likely policy, ethical and legal violations among senior
and supervisory staff at the BLM’s Office of Law Enforcement and Security.”
Wooten further stated these issues, “…made a mockery of our
position of special trust and confidence, portrayed extreme unprofessional
bias, adversely affected our agency’s mission and likely the trial regarding
Cliven Bundy…” and “put our agency and specific law enforcement supervisors in potential
legal, civil and administrative jeopardy.”
Some of the actions taken by certain BLM officers are simply
too crude to include in this publication. However, Wooten did report:
º Conduct that was, “discriminatory, harassing and showed
clear prejudice against the defendants, their supporters and Mormons.”
º Uncovered comments where BLM agents “bragged about
roughing up Dave Bundy” and “grinding his face into the ground.”
º That BLM employees, “didn’t properly turn in the required
discovery material (likely exculpatory evidence)”
º That one BLM Supervisor, “instigated the unprofessional
monitoring of jail calls between defendants and their wives, without prosecutor
or FBI consent.”
º That former BLM Special Agent-In-Charge Dan Love purposely
ignored federal and state recommendations, “in order to command the most
intrusive, oppressive, large scale and militaristic trespass cattle impound
possible.”
BLM Agent Wooten also say his investigation found,
“excessive use of force, civil rights and policy violations.” Further, Wooten
says, “there was an improper cover-up in virtually every matter that a
particular BLM SAC participated in, or oversaw.”
This has turned into a textbook case of federal abuse and
incompetence, all because a federal land management agency refuses to allow
themselves to be treated like other landowners within a state. In New Mexico
and most other western states, the landowner reports that estrays are
trespassing on their property and the appropriate state agency takes steps to
remove the trespassing livestock. Usually
a clean and efficient operation conducted by state employees under state law. That
procedure, though, can’t be used to justify larger federal budgets, additional
employees or an increase in the federal arsenal, so the feds refuse to utilize
this tried and true method.
I’m reminded that in his opening statement to the jury, the
Acting U.S. Attorney said this case was not just about grazing fees, it was
really about upholding the rule of law. Five weeks or so later, the case is
still about the rule of law, only now it is the feds who are the accused
transgressors.
By the time you read this, we should know whether Navarro
declares it a mistrial with prejudice, or without prejudice. If she dismisses
it with prejudice, the defendants cannot be brought up on those charges again.
Let’s hope the rule of law prevails.
Another Heinrich
Maneuver
As one of its last items of business this year, the U.S.
Senate passed S.432, the Cerros Del Norte Conservation Act, which would
establish two wilderness areas within the Rio Grande del Norte National
Monument. It may have been the last order of business of the Senate but it was
one of the first orders of business of the Senate Committee on Energy and
Natural Resources, which passed the bill on May 3. Weirdly, the Committee
didn’t invite the views of the Trump administration, and instead inserted the
testimony of an Obama administration official which had been given two years
prior.
This seems to fit in with the typical legislative methods
employed by Senators Udall and Heinrich. Remember the Sabinoso Wilderness? That
was the wilderness pushed by Udall that had no public access. It only passed
because it was part of an Omnibus bill. Then they brought us the
Columbine-Hondo Wilderness and transferred the Valles Caldera as part of a
national defense bill. The action on this new wilderness bill shouldn’t
surprise us.
Monument Misstep
In a recent interview, Interior Secretary Zinke shared some
interesting information concerning the monument review and the Organ
Mountains-Desert Peaks National Monument. “The president tasked me to get the local
voice,” Zinke said, and, “Overwhelmingly, the communities were comfortable with
the monuments.”
That tells us the millions of dollars the environmental
foundations spent in funding the NM Wilderness Alliance, the Friends of the
Organs, the green chamber of commerce, etc., and their multi-year spending on
television ads, newspaper ads, radio spots and other marketing venues, was
money well spent. I mean, it fooled Zinke, now didn’t it.
Until next time, be a nuisance to the devil and don’t forget
to check that cinch.
Frank
DuBois was the NM Secretary of Agriculture from 1988 to 2003, is the author of
a blog: The Westerner (www.thewesterner.blogspot.com) and is the founder of The DuBois
Rodeo Scholarship and The DuBois Western Heritage Foundation
2 comments:
The REAL tragedy.........in my opinion.......was that the liberal left judge......declared a "mistrial".......rather than dismissing the case.
An even bigger tragedy is how this goes on while largely ignored by the media ...except for an occasional biased article, laced with inaccurate stereotypes to justify their indifference towards the injustices that the government has put on the Bundys and other farmers and ranchers.
If Navarro ok's a fourth trial...I say game on ...and have the defense attorneys insist on cameras in the courtroom.
Post a Comment